With two weeks of results, and post Wimbledon, you always hope for some good figures at this time of the year..... And although you can't tick ALL the boxes, the lads didn't disappoint.....
Our top 100 lot are led by Cam getting back into the top-50 Jack PJ (age 22) has zoomed into the top-200 Arthur Féry (age 23) is up over 100 places As is Oliver Bonding (age 18) Oliver Tarvet (age 21) has appeared out of nowhere , and on the cusp of the top-400 Big jumps for Marcus Walters ad Oscar Weightman to get inside the top-1000 And also for Lui, Finn M, Tom etc, who aren't far away
14th July 2025
Top 500 and main upward movers
5 (-1) Jack Draper 43 (+18) Cameron Norrie 57 (-6) Jacob Fearnley
142 (+9) Billy Harris 145 (+9) Dan Evans 176 (+24) Jan Choinski 190 (+91) Jack Pinnington Jones (CH) 199 (-3) Jay Clarke
227 (-3) Johannus Monday 234 (+14) Oliver Crawford 249 (+14) Ryan Peniston 295 (-2) George Loffhagen
350 (+111) Arthur Féry 362 (+12) Alastair Gray 397 (+25) Paul Jubb
402 (+331) Oliver Tarvet (CH) (age 21) 407 (+64) Kyle Edmund 416 (+5) Henry Searle (age 19) 436 (-2) Stuart Parker 450 (-2) Giles Hussey
453 (+92) Hamish Stewart (CH) 460 (-9) Anton Matusevich 475 (+1) Charles Broom 483 (+11) Harry Wendelken 497 (-2) Aidan McHugh
534 (+23) Liam Broady 576 (+36) Felix Gill 681 (+25) Millen Hurrion (CH) 770 (+34) Matt Summers 816 (+104) Oliver Bonding (CH) (age 18) 833 (+191) Oscar Weightman 835 (+25) Patrick Brady (CH) (CH) (age 20) 943 (+221) Marcus Walters (CH) 990 (+25) Finn Bass
1100 (+400) Lui Maxted (CH) (age 21) 1111 (+626) Finn Murgett (CH) 1210 (+168) Tom Hands (CH) 1280 (+73) Alexis Canter 1521 (+190) James Beaven (CH) (age 20) 1757 (+396) Viktor Frydrych (CH) (age 19) 1869 (+97) Luc Koenig (age 21)
EDIT: Hamish Stewart added, thanks SuperT
-- Edited by Coup Droit on Monday 14th of July 2025 09:05:54 AM
Good to see and of course the existence of Wimbledon at this time is not a reason as such for certain better figures, and they can't always be better. For one Wimbledon replaces the previous Wimbledon. So if the figures are better the players have done better this year. ( tbf I guess CD did say you "hope for" rsther than it's an expected occurrence ).
A bit like a former work colleague who claimed that the company based the annual pay increase on the September RPI because ( he said ) that was always lower, when actually similarly the RPI figure is taking out one month one year and replacing it with the same month the following year in a 12 month rolling figure.
-- Edited by indiana on Monday 14th of July 2025 03:15:00 PM