Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 34 - ATP Challenger 50 - Nonthaburi 1, Nonthaburi, Thailand (hard)


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58126
Date:
Week 34 - ATP Challenger 50 - Nonthaburi 1, Nonthaburi, Thailand (hard)


L32:  (1) Alastair Gray WR 255 (= CH) vs Arthur Cazaux (FRA) WR 400 (CH = 281 in April)

L32:  (4) Billy Harris WR 294 (= CH) vs Alibek Kachmazov (***) WR 327 (CH = 323 at the start of this month)



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58126
Date:

QR1:  Hong Seong-chan (KOR) WR 478 (CH = 343 in October 2016) vs (q9) Stuart Parker WR 456 (= CH)

QR1:  (q3) Charles Broom WR 410 (CH = 405 last week) vs Timo Legout (FRA) WR 493 (= CH)



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55575
Date:

Four GB players, in a Challenger, in Thailand

It's grand that we have so many players at this level.....

__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4586
Date:

Yes its clever scheduling given it is essentially a 25k level field at best.

__________________


Top national player

Status: Offline
Posts: 3390
Date:

Jaggy1876 wrote:

Yes its clever scheduling given it is essentially a 25k level field at best.


 More of our lower ranked players should be entering challengers the week of GS qualifying



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41026
Date:

Jaggy1876 wrote:

Yes its clever scheduling given it is essentially a 25k level field at best.


 Good chance for the GB #9 and #10 to get big points. I wonder where the GB #10 will be ranked after this week 



__________________


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1329
Date:

Jaggy1876 wrote:

Yes its clever scheduling given it is essentially a 25k level field at best.


It's not really that similar to a 25k field. At Aldershot this week, the number 3 seed was WR 436, 3 places lower than the last direct acceptance here. Put another way, 20 players in the top 400 here versus 2 in Aldershot. Or 14 players in the top 350 versus 1.



__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4586
Date:

jb288 wrote:
Jaggy1876 wrote:

Yes its clever scheduling given it is essentially a 25k level field at best.


It's not really that similar to a 25k field. At Aldershot this week, the number 3 seed was WR 436, 3 places lower than the last direct acceptance here. Put another way, 20 players in the top 400 here versus 2 in Aldershot. Or 14 players in the top 350 versus 1.


 Check back a few weeks and I think you will find it is similar. Its a weak challenger field, poor argument comparing Aldershot most of the players that would play there have travelled for the weaker challengers. My point stands, you sometimes need to look deeper to compare.



__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4586
Date:

indiana wrote:
Jaggy1876 wrote:

Yes its clever scheduling given it is essentially a 25k level field at best.


 Good chance for the GB #9 and #10 to get big points. I wonder where the GB #10 will be ranked after this week 


 Exactly

Come on Billy



__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2566
Date:

Jaggy1876 wrote:
jb288 wrote:
Jaggy1876 wrote:

Yes its clever scheduling given it is essentially a 25k level field at best.


It's not really that similar to a 25k field. At Aldershot this week, the number 3 seed was WR 436, 3 places lower than the last direct acceptance here. Put another way, 20 players in the top 400 here versus 2 in Aldershot. Or 14 players in the top 350 versus 1.


 Check back a few weeks and I think you will find it is similar. Its a weak challenger field, poor argument comparing Aldershot most of the players that would play there have travelled for the weaker challengers. My point stands, you sometimes need to look deeper to compare.


 This is weaker that many challenger fields but, it is a 50k challenger, not an 80k or higher.  Its certainly higher than an average 25k. 



__________________

 Its really not as bad as they say :)



Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4586
Date:

The point is its a weak challenger field because of the US Open. Its rare to have a challenger with no player ranked within the top 250.

Its exactly why Billy and Ali are camped here for the month. Both should be top 250 by the end of it. Ali might even make it without winning much.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58126
Date:

QR1:  Hong Seong-chan (KOR) WR 478 defeated (q9) Stuart Parker WR 456 by 6-3 1-6 6-3  cry

QR1:  Timo Legout (FRA) WR 493 defeated (q3) Charles Broom WR 410 by 3-6 6-1 6-4   cry

 



__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2566
Date:

And I think we ALL agree with that Jaggy. I think it stronger than a 25K "at best" though which was the point you originally made though.

__________________

 Its really not as bad as they say :)



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58126
Date:

L16:  Charles Broom & Daniel Cukierman (ISR) CR 578 (306+272) vs Nicola Kuhn & Illya Marchenko (GER/UKR) UNR
L16:  Billy Harris & Courtney John Lock (ZIM) CR 609 (351+258) vs (2) Tristan Schoolkate & Dane Sweeny (AUS/AUS) CR 410 (237+183)



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 42388
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:

QR1:  Hong Seong-chan (KOR) WR 478 defeated (q9) Stuart Parker WR 456 by 6-3 1-6 6-3  cry

QR1:  Timo Legout (FRA) WR 493 defeated (q3) Charles Broom WR 410 by 3-6 6-1 6-4   cry

 


 Might be a weak field but you still need to win your matches. 



__________________
1 2 3  >  Last»  | Page of 3  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard