British Tennis Forum - Celebrating 20 Years!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Race for the Wimbledon wildcards 2026


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 29351
Date:
Race for the Wimbledon wildcards 2026


I've been following the thread in the men's forum and thought we ought to have a similar one for the women. so here are some names to get things started. I haven't had time yet to analyse the points situation as Brittak did in their excellent post, but Pierrot's tables are a good starting point. The ranking bands below refer to the 23/02 tables.

Main draw - direct entry. Emma, Sonay, Katie B, Fran - all currently top 100

Top 200 - Harriet Dart

Top 300 - Mimi, Katie S, Lily, Heather, Mika

Top 400 - Marnie, Naiktha

Top 500 - Jodie, Emily A, Millie R, Vic, Ranah, Ella

Others - Alice, Hannah, Katy D, Esther, Brooke.

There might be one or two others on the radar - Holly Smart ?



-- Edited by the addict on Tuesday 17th of March 2026 11:51:56 AM

__________________


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1372
Date:

How about Hannah Klugman?



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 29351
Date:

Babfive wrote:

How about Hannah Klugman?


Oops, missed her. Now edited.

Surely a QWC at least.



__________________
Var


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2080
Date:

Well last year Hannah, Mika and Mimi got main draw wildcards. No other juniors on the horizon at the level they were last year, so wondering if they will repeat?

__________________
VRoberts


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 60133
Date:

the addict wrote:
Babfive wrote:

How about Hannah Klugman?


Oops, missed her. Now edited.

Surely a QWC at least.


She had a main draw one last year

As long as she's healthy, and not losing to really lowly ranked players, she'll get one this year too

As will Mika, for sure 

The 18U champion (to be decided in a few weeks) will also get a quali WC 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18749
Date:

The women will be fairly straight forward due to the lack of depth, unlike the men.


__________________


Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1695
Date:

Hopefully Fran won't be needing one but she needs to stay healthy and have a strong clay court swing to stay in the Top 100.

__________________


Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 788
Date:

Var wrote:

Well last year Hannah, Mika and Mimi got main draw wildcards. No other juniors on the horizon at the level they were last year, so wondering if they will repeat?


 I had the same thought. All three look likely to get  repeat wildcards again I think.

Harriet, because of her ranking is almost a shoo in, and Fran could well need one.

After that, it looks a little more complicated - both Heather and Lily look to be gradually sliding down the rankings, and although because of what Heather has done for British tennis, you could give her a wildcard again, I'm not sure it is certain by any means. Katie S could get one if she starts actually playing again, and same story for Jodie, but I can't see anyone yet who is really that deserving.

Lots of time to go, but it feels like quite a quiet spring so far, for British tennis, outside of the top 100 and lots of players if they hit a good run of form could get a direct entry wildcard..



__________________
Andy Parker


Masters Series Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 3726
Date:

With the usual caveats around fitness and unexpected good performances over the next 3 months...

Fran, Harriet, Mimi, Mika and Hannah are shoo-ins. I dont see how the 3 amigos getting a WC is even questionable. Theres more of a case for Mimi and Mika than last year and its Hannahs first year as a full time pro that she'll get nominated for the experience again. I'd expect Heather and Jodie to get WCs too citing injury for their poor ranking and Heather also for still being one of the most popular recognisable British women to the paying spectators and British media, those two subject to WC places not being required for foreigners.

QWCs, Katie S and Lily are shoo-ins. I'd say 90% chance for Marni and Alicia, both LTA supported, leaving 1 for Naiktha, Millie, Vic Ella and Ranah to fight over. If they want to give one to a teenager for experience instead then they'd be looking at Brooke, Allegra and Ruby but i dont think so. Our top LTA supported juniors Hollie, Megan and Daniella have not played enough adult events yet to be considered this year though one of them could get the qWC for the Junior National winner.


__________________


Masters Series Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 3726
Date:

Emily Appleton possibly. She made the FQR last year.

__________________
Var


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2080
Date:

Lambda wrote:

With the usual caveats around fitness and unexpected good performances over the next 3 months...

Fran, Harriet, Mimi, Mika and Hannah are shoo-ins. I dont see how the 3 amigos getting a WC is even questionable. Theres more of a case for Mimi and Mika than last year and its Hannahs first year as a full time pro that she'll get nominated for the experience again. I'd expect Heather and Jodie to get WCs too citing injury for their poor ranking and Heather also for still being one of the most popular recognisable British women to the paying spectators and British media, those two subject to WC places not being required for foreigners.

QWCs, Katie S and Lily are shoo-ins. I'd say 90% chance for Marni and Alicia, both LTA supported, leaving 1 for Naiktha, Millie, Vic Ella and Ranah to fight over. If they want to give one to a teenager for experience instead then they'd be looking at Brooke, Allegra and Ruby but i dont think so. Our top LTA supported juniors Hollie, Megan and Daniella have not played enough adult events yet to be considered this year though one of them could get the qWC for the Junior National winner.


 All to play for really, discounting MM and H.A good run by any of the others would catch the selectors eye. 



__________________
VRoberts


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 60133
Date:

Just to mention that neither Hannah and Mika have entered the top junior nationals this year

So there's no chance of the Wimbly quali wildcard being 'doubled up' by someone who was getting one anyway

So the other under-eighteen girls really do have something to play for and there will be a 'new' name in the adult qualis this year

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 29351
Date:

Var wrote:
Lambda wrote:

With the usual caveats around fitness and unexpected good performances over the next 3 months...

Fran, Harriet, Mimi, Mika and Hannah are shoo-ins. I dont see how the 3 amigos getting a WC is even questionable. Theres more of a case for Mimi and Mika than last year and its Hannahs first year as a full time pro that she'll get nominated for the experience again. I'd expect Heather and Jodie to get WCs too citing injury for their poor ranking and Heather also for still being one of the most popular recognisable British women to the paying spectators and British media, those two subject to WC places not being required for foreigners.

QWCs, Katie S and Lily are shoo-ins. I'd say 90% chance for Marni and Alicia, both LTA supported, leaving 1 for Naiktha, Millie, Vic Ella and Ranah to fight over. If they want to give one to a teenager for experience instead then they'd be looking at Brooke, Allegra and Ruby but i dont think so. Our top LTA supported juniors Hollie, Megan and Daniella have not played enough adult events yet to be considered this year though one of them could get the qWC for the Junior National winner.


 All to play for really, discounting MM and H.A good run by any of the others would catch the selectors eye. 


 Looks as if the WC playoffs could be interesting this year. Lambda mentions four candidates for the last WC and I would add into the playoff list Emily A, Katy D, Vic and Alice. There are quite a few others that have played in the GB tournaments this year to add to the list of the possibles. Am I right in saying there is a place for the top US college player as well ?



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 60133
Date:

Lambda has Vic in the list already for the last direct quali wildcard

I don't think Alice Gillan stands any chance

Nor Vic, indeed (short of miraculous results between now and then)

They will all be in the playoff competition, for the two other wildcards that aren't in Lambda's list, obviously, as they're earmarked already

There's no automatic place for the top US college player, to the best of my knowledge

A reminder of the 'official' (don't laugh) Wimbledon criteria:

4. CRITERIA FOR WILD CARD RECOMMENDATION INTO THE MAIN DRAW, QUALIFYING
AND PLAY-OFF EVENTS
When selecting which players should be recommended for a Wild Card, the LTA Panel will use
its expert knowledge to analyse which players are likely to progress in the tournament,
including consideration of the following criteria:
(i) Professional commitment:
The LTA will take into account the players demonstration of the highest level of commitment,
professionalism and dedication towards their tennis throughout the whole preceding year. This
includes competitive performances and a commitment in training to continual improvement.
(ii) Ranking:
a. Singles: significant weight will be placed on the ATP/WTA rankings of players and, in the
case of younger players, ITF junior rankings may be considered;
b. Doubles: the combined (singles or doubles) ranking will be considered (for the avoidance
of doubt the combined doubles ranking is that of the individual player as opposed to the
doubles pairs ranking as a team).
(iii) Recent results:
The quality of recent results (or those prior to a recent injury) in other events will be considered.
This will usually mean ATP/WTA or ITF Mens or Womens World Tennis Tour events or ITF
World Tennis Tour Junior events and will be considered in particular where players have made
progress within grass-court events. As a guide, results from the last three months will be the
most relevant.
For doubles, consideration will be given to the previous playing record of a proposed doubles
team, with particular consideration given to performance in Davis Cup / Billie Jean King Cup
ties, Grand Slams and main ATP/WTA tour events.
(iv) Previous Wild Cards:
A players Wild Card history at The Championships, including both the number of Wild Cards
and the quality of performances will be considered.
(v) Development opportunities:
Consideration will be given as to whether specific players will gain a particular benefit from
playing in The Championships Main Draw, Qualifying or Playoff events. This will normally be
based on player potential assessments (normally younger players) and recent results.
For doubles, the LTA Panel will also consider the combination of the players proposed and
whether they have complementary playing styles such that they are likely to progress in the
draw.
(vi) Representing Great Britain:
Consideration will be given as to whether the player is eligible and makes themselves available,
if selected, to play for Great Britain in the Davis Cup / Billie Jean King Cup and how they
perform in those ties.
(vii) Conduct:
The conduct of the player may be taken into consideration, including if the player has been in
breach of any LTA rules, regulations or codes of conduct or those of the ATP/WTA/ITF tour or
The Championships.
(viii) Fitness:
The players medical fitness to perform at their best at The Championships will be considered.
(ix) Recent injury or illness:
The LTA Panel will consider cases where a player has suffered from injury, illness or
exceptional circumstances which may have prevented a player from achieving a high enough
ranking or results to warrant consideration.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 29351
Date:

My add-on list was for the play-offs wink But I had Vic in twice.

Emily A needs to get some decent singles results to get back in contention.



__________________
1 2  >  Last»  | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard