Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Wimbledon wild cards


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4900
Date:
RE: Wimbledon wild cards


Count Zero wrote:

wow they wont even give boggo a dubs WC! that will be harsh in extreme wont it? i knoe he wants thew wc



They are probably giving the first round of doubles wild cards to the actual doubles specialists and then seeing who from the singles boys is best suited to the remaining couple of wild cards.

I'd expect Boggo plus partner to get one of them once they are finalised.

Good shout on Berankis as well for one of the remaining wild cards and he could probably justify one with his result this year.

Don't think Mahut will get one unless he has a great run here, given that he got one last year and lost to Vliegen in round one (I think), which even if Tomic gets the expected WC still leaves a spot open.

I think Boggo still has a chance of that WC but to get it, I think he'll have to beat Dimitrov and Lalo before he'll be considered, and then maybe even Benneteau/Anderson, as if he reaches the QF's here, it would look very harsh not to give him one. (and he is capable of beating all of those players - Lalo would be the toughest, but he had never won a match at Queens until last year and is not the most reliable player in the world)



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18715
Date:

I broadly agree with FD's assessment. Kiefer is also someone who will be known to a large number of casual tennis fans with his record at Wimbledon and in the Australian Open. Even if the AELTC had only wanted to give Kuznetsov a QWC (as per the agreement with the ITF) they were forced to upgrade once they were given an LTA list with 7 recommendations for QWCs, leaving none spare

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18715
Date:

spud wrote:

Wimb qualifying starts Tues of Eastbourne week, so i think they can play qualifying?



Assuming it is the same as previous years, Wimbledon qualifying will start on Monday for the men. You can play Eastbourne qualifying as well, but anyone still in on Sunday afternoon (when qualifying should have been completed, weather permitting) will be withdrawn from Wimbledon qualifying. That's why the qualifying fields at Eastbourne (and previously Nottingham) tend to have very few players ranked between 100 and 300

 



__________________


County player

Status: Offline
Posts: 811
Date:

steven wrote:

Apparently Kuznetsov is last year's junior champion, fair enough I guess.




I was just to pull you up on that if someone else hadn't already! :p How could you not know who Kuznetsov was?! You know it's Wimbledon tradition to award a WC to the previous year's Junior Champion! And I thought you were aware of who won in 2009! wink Honestly! nobiggrin



__________________
King of Slice
"He's on a one-man mission to bring the slice back to tennis." Inverdale



Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 9477
Date:

Isn't it simply that Boggo is being penalised for turning down the Davis Cup spot.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 11934
Date:

philwrig wrote:

Isn't it simply that Boggo is being penalised for turning down the Davis Cup spot.




 possibly, but wimby do have final say over their WC's so could give him one anyway.



__________________

 

Count Zero - Creator of the Statistical Tennis Extrapolation & Verification ENtity or, as we like to call him, that steven.


www.alexbogdanovic.com



Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4900
Date:

DavidC wrote:

spud wrote:

Wimb qualifying starts Tues of Eastbourne week, so i think they can play qualifying?



Assuming it is the same as previous years, Wimbledon qualifying will start on Monday for the men. You can play Eastbourne qualifying as well, but anyone still in on Sunday afternoon (when qualifying should have been completed, weather permitting) will be withdrawn from Wimbledon qualifying. That's why the qualifying fields at Eastbourne (and previously Nottingham) tend to have very few players ranked between 100 and 300

 


If I remember the stats correctly, last year, the only player who entered Eastbourne qualies who was not either already in the Wimbledon main draw is some way, either by WC or DE, or was ranked too low to make the qualies cut was Brydan Klein.


 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 34418
Date:

A tweet from 5livetennis prompted me to check this - in 2006, Marc Gicquel got a WC for Roland Garros at age 29, won a round there and reached the top 100 the same year, staying there for more than 3 years.

Another thing that suggests that the idea of giving up on players in their mid-20s is way out of date.



__________________

GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!

GB top 25s (ranks, whereabouts) & stats - http://www.britishtennis.net/stats.html



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 11934
Date:

i agree wholeheartedly, but i don't think its age that's the problem, its the number.

__________________

 

Count Zero - Creator of the Statistical Tennis Extrapolation & Verification ENtity or, as we like to call him, that steven.


www.alexbogdanovic.com



Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4900
Date:

Kiefer has just beaten world number 14 Mikhail Youzhny in the first round in Halle in what was a very good match, which suggests he is getting back towards his best and probably deserving of a wild card.

Can't think of too many more potential applicants who have the ability to beat a top 15 player who has just reached the QF of a slam.

__________________


County player

Status: Offline
Posts: 944
Date:

Anyone just hear Greg Rusedski, a lot of sense being talked there!

__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4900
Date:

British_is_Best wrote:

Anyone just hear Greg Rusedski, a lot of sense being talked there!



Greg often does talk a lot of sense surrounding the Brits, which is why a lot of people wanted him as the Davis Cup coach.


 



__________________


Lower Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 205
Date:

A LOT of sense. Pundits now ruining it by going for the "lucky old Boggo, gets to qualify instead of get a WC, that's so much better for him" angle. furious

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41133
Date:

JM1138 wrote:

A LOT of sense. Pundits now ruining it by going for the "lucky old Boggo, gets to qualify instead of get a WC, that's so much better for him" angle. furious




 "lucky"  ?     confuse.gif



-- Edited by indiana on Tuesday 8th of June 2010 12:58:32 PM

__________________


Lower Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 205
Date:

indiana wrote:

 

JM1138 wrote:

A LOT of sense. Pundits now ruining it by going for the "lucky old Boggo, gets to qualify instead of get a WC, that's so much better for him" angle. furious




"lucky"  ?     confuse.gif



-- Edited by indiana on Tuesday 8th of June 2010 12:58:32 PM

 




Well yeah, it's ridiculous is what I was saying. Obviously it's not lucky at all, it just seemed that that was the implication.

 

Probably all academic now after that last set anyway bleh.



__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4 58  >  Last»  | Page of 8  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard