Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Doping Again !


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 42258
Date:
RE: Doping Again !


indiana wrote:

Apparently she has actually served 3 weeks in season after being provisional suspended. It was why she missed the Korean Open, China Open and Wuhan Open before that provisional suspension was lifted. Having ultimately been given a month, she now just has to serve' the final week or so and will be eligible again on 4th December.

Www.itia.tennis.bbc.co.uk/sport/tennis/articles/cm2z5ek3m5mo


 Surely the month should have been in one hit and when she would have played ie miss the tour finals? Why would she be allowed to play that, suspension lifted for the big one, and then effectively re suspended tk serve her final week - you can do it over Xmas if you like, Iga. Pathetic 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40977
Date:

JonH comes home wrote:
indiana wrote:

Apparently she has actually served 3 weeks in season after being provisional suspended. It was why she missed the Korean Open, China Open and Wuhan Open before that provisional suspension was lifted. Having ultimately been given a month, she now just has to serve' the final week or so and will be eligible again on 4th December.

Www.itia.tennis.bbc.co.uk/sport/tennis/articles/cm2z5ek3m5mo


 Surely the month should have been in one hit and when she would have played ie miss the tour finals? Why would she be allowed to play that, suspension lifted for the big one, and then effectively re suspended tk serve her final week - you can do it rover Xmas if you like, Iga. Pathetic 


I read it that the ITIA explanation is that she became eligible again after she appealed and so her provisional suspension was then stopped while her case was further considered. Then with the one month judgement this week, she had 3 weeks served and the remainder to serve out immediately ( effectively in the close season for her ). 

The month only came into force this week, initially it being an unspecified provisional suspension while they awaited a response. 



-- Edited by indiana on Thursday 28th of November 2024 09:37:39 PM



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 42258
Date:

indiana wrote:
JonH comes home wrote:
indiana wrote:

Apparently she has actually served 3 weeks in season after being provisional suspended. It was why she missed the Korean Open, China Open and Wuhan Open before that provisional suspension was lifted. Having ultimately been given a month, she now just has to serve' the final week or so and will be eligible again on 4th December.

Www.itia.tennis.bbc.co.uk/sport/tennis/articles/cm2z5ek3m5mo


 Surely the month should have been in one hit and when she would have played ie miss the tour finals? Why would she be allowed to play that, suspension lifted for the big one, and then effectively re suspended tk serve her final week - you can do it rover Xmas if you like, Iga. Pathetic 


I read it that the ITIA explanation is that she became eligible again after she appealed and so her provisional suspension was then stopped while her case was further considered. Then with the one month judgement this week, she had 3 weeks served and the remainder to serve out immediately ( effectively in the close season for her ). 

The month only came into force this week, initially it being an unspecified provisional suspension while they awaited a response. 



-- Edited by indiana on Thursday 28th of November 2024 09:37:39 PM


 Understood - to be honest I havent read the judgement so didnt see the detail. Still, feels like she got off lightly on this. As did Sinner. 

So many players seem to take these substances accidentally, they really are very unlucky. 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40977
Date:

I haven't read the judgement either. I just gathered as above from the BBC article.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 42258
Date:

indiana wrote:

I haven't read the judgement either. I just gathered as above from the BBC article.


 Cool - yes, hadnt read that either - I go through life forming opinions on things I am remarkably uninformed about! 



__________________
Var


Satellite level

Status: Online
Posts: 1227
Date:

Think this Iga story might run and run. Simons Halep has added her opinion. www.bbc.co.uk/sport/tennis/articles/cx2nx1eg70go



-- Edited by Var on Friday 29th of November 2024 12:28:10 PM

__________________
VRoberts


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 23428
Date:

A further article on the BBC website discussing the differences between several cases, including Swiatek, Sinner, Halep and Tara

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/tennis/articles/cj4vr7gypqgo



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6863
Date:

plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose

 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 42258
Date:

Halep has got a wild card for the AO qualies

x.com/josemorgado/status/1869319529664598178/photo/1

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 19401
Date:

Max Purcell

www.bbc.com/sport/tennis/articles/cgq1zpe8p00o

__________________


Masters Series Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 3818
Date:

Sounds like the Purcell one he hasnt actually failed a test. Sounds like a Nurse/doctor didnt listen to him when he asked for an IV drip to contain less than the allowable ML of vitamins. When he found out it didnt he then reported himself.

__________________


Masters Series Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 3818
Date:

Madadman wrote:

Sounds like the Purcell one he hasnt actually failed a test. Sounds like a Nurse/doctor didnt listen to him when he asked for an IV drip to contain less than the allowable ML of vitamins. When he found out it didnt he then reported himself.


 Actually I think I mis-read Purcells comments. When he checked with the clinic he had been to he was then given his records which showed the IV drip that was used and shared this with the authorities so I think he might have failed a test.

Max Purcell on Instagram:

As announced by the ITIA today, I have voluntarily accepted a provisional suspension since I unknowingly received an IV infusion of vitamins above the allowable limit of 100 ml. Until last week when I received medical records from a clinic showing that the amount of an IV I had received was above 100 ml, I was fully convinced that I had done everything to ensure that I had followed the WADA regulations and methods. But the records show that the IV was over that 100ml limit, even though I told the medical clinic that I was a professional athlete and needed the IV to be below 100 ml. This news was devastating to me because I pride myself on being an athlete who always makes sure that everything is WADA safe. I volunteered this information to the ITIA and have been as transparent as possible in trying to put this whole situation behind me. I look forward to being back on the court soon.



__________________
Jan


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 7963
Date:

I must admit I'm surprised that vitamins are on the list.
Feel sorry for him.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 55506
Date:

Madadman wrote:
Madadman wrote:

Sounds like the Purcell one he hasnt actually failed a test. Sounds like a Nurse/doctor didnt listen to him when he asked for an IV drip to contain less than the allowable ML of vitamins. When he found out it didnt he then reported himself.


 Actually I think I mis-read Purcells comments. When he checked with the clinic he had been to he was then given his records which showed the IV drip that was used and shared this with the authorities so I think he might have failed a test.

Max Purcell on Instagram:

As announced by the ITIA today, I have voluntarily accepted a provisional suspension since I unknowingly received an IV infusion of vitamins above the allowable limit of 100 ml. Until last week when I received medical records from a clinic showing that the amount of an IV I had received was above 100 ml, I was fully convinced that I had done everything to ensure that I had followed the WADA regulations and methods. But the records show that the IV was over that 100ml limit, even though I told the medical clinic that I was a professional athlete and needed the IV to be below 100 ml. This news was devastating to me because I pride myself on being an athlete who always makes sure that everything is WADA safe. I volunteered this information to the ITIA and have been as transparent as possible in trying to put this whole situation behind me. I look forward to being back on the court soon.


 Now THAT is something you would be able to sue the clinic for

If they were told to keep it below 100 ml, and why, and they didn't, that is a very clear breach, and the damages are easily quantifiable 



__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2682
Date:

Jan wrote:

I must admit I'm surprised that vitamins are on the list.
Feel sorry for him.


The vitamins are not the issue. Anti-doping regulations prohibit an IV infusion of more than 100ml of anything, including of permitted substances, unless it is part of hospital or emergency treatment.

__________________
«First  <  137 38 39 40  >  Last»  | Page of 40  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard