Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 18 - ATP 250 Series: BMW Open, Munich (red clay) - doubles


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58320
Date:
RE: Week 18 - ATP 250 Series: BMW Open, Munich (red clay) - doubles


Jamie & John run out comfortable s :

Final:  (3) Jamie Murray & John Peers (AUS) CR 67 (33+34) defeated (PR) Colin Fleming & Ross Hutchins CR 289 (36+253) by 4 & 2  smile  cry

Colin & Ross may have missed out on the title, but their run to the final should have enabled the latter to scrape away a good bit more of the rust which will have accumulated over the last year or so.



__________________
Jan


Hall of fame

Status: Online
Posts: 7983
Date:

I was out of internet contact yesterday, so just catching up now. So pleased to see that Colin and Ross made the final. Happy whichever team won - so well done to all of them!

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 41153
Date:

Very good to see Jamie reaping the benefits of a settled partnership. Who'ed have thunk ? :)

__________________


Admin:Moderator + Tennis Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 12091
Date:

We banged on about it for long enough! I hope they keep together and continue to do well.

I would slightly have preferred Colin and Ross to win, but hey, at least they reached a final. Baby steps.

__________________


Challenger qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2372
Date:

Murray and Peers played solid all week, well done to them.

Right time to come into form before a few masters and the french!

__________________


Admin: Moderator+Tennis Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 7255
Date:

Congratulations all round on this one I think

I find it interesting how much less of a factor surface is in doubles (for all players not just the clay-averse Brits) - does anyone have an opinion/reason why? Does the fact that there are two of you covering the court make the movement (the main differential between surfaces) less important, I would have thought movement is equally important in doubles just more likely forward to back rather than side to side but perhaps I was wrong.

__________________

To look at a thing is quite different from seeing a thing and one does not see anything until one sees its beauty


Oscar Wilde



Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 41153
Date:

I would have thought the fact that pairs will usually have one player at the net from the start of the point and that there is clearly more volleying generally in doubles makes the surface much less of an issue.

That's how I've always looked at it anyway.

__________________


Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1795
Date:

In doubles, you have to be moving forward and attacking the ball all the time. Camping out metres behind the baseline as on clay in singles is not an option. If your opponent nails a shot right onto your baseline, you still have to take it early - going back and hitting a defensive shot is not an option as the net man will have it for breakfast. The style of play is therefore similar irrespective of what surface is being played on.  

Speed of foot is less important in doubles than in singles. This means that a doubles player can often be competitive in his mid thirties and this is rarely the case in singles.   Playing doubles gives oldies like me a chance against youngsters who would run down everything I could hit at them in singles. 



__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 | Page of 3  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard