The reason I'm critical of Henman is twofold. One, I've heard him once too often slagging off the state of British tennis while he does nothing about it himself. Two, we're not in a good position presently with tennis and we have to maximise retention of what talent we have within the sport. Clearly, he has much to offer.
With Rusedski, I couldn't put it better than Oakland has above. He has at least shown drive and commitment to the cause.
The reason I'm critical of Henman is twofold. One, I've heard him once too often slagging off the state of British tennis while he does nothing about it himself. Two, we're not in a good position presently with tennis and we have to maximise retention of what talent we have within the sport. Clearly, he has much to offer.
With Rusedski, I couldn't put it better than Oakland has above. He has at least shown drive and commitment to the cause.
I can slag off the government but it doesn't mean I'm going to stand for Parliament.
Just because you're critical, you're not under an obligation to pursue a career to change things.
And the fact that we (the UK) have to maximise retention in order to improve things is the LTA's problem and fault, not Tim's. Why haven't the LTA managed to persuade Tim to join?
and as to Greg, well he does - I believe - get paid handsomely for it.
I don't see why someone should automatically get kudos for agreeing to do a well-paid job, and doing it reasonably well (let's assume)
-- Edited by Coup Droit on Tuesday 26th of August 2014 09:03:57 AM
Coup, with respect, you're Mr Nobody from Nowhere; nobody expects you to stand for parliament and your mouthings off probably have as much validity as mine. Henman, by comparison, is an ex-world No 4.
Any sports federation anywhere has to keep knowledgeable people within its sport to drive it forward. We might as well be bringing up each others' children otherwise.
-- Edited by EddietheEagle on Tuesday 26th of August 2014 09:12:26 AM
Coup, with respect, you're Mr Nobody from Nowhere; nobody expects you to stand for parliament and your mouthings off probably have as much validity as mine. Henman, by comparison, in an ex-world No 4.
Any sports federation anywhere has to keep knowledgeable people within its sport to drive it forward. We might as well be bringing up each others' children otherwise.
Absolutely. So why hasn't the federation managed to keep Henman ? Why is that Henman's fault and not the LTAs fault ? How many footballers become involved in the football federation (as opposed to simply becoming highly paid managers which is hardly, in my mind, generously 'giving something back'). Even more, how many do it on half-salaries or something that suggests proper altruism ? Why should Henman have to (if he doesn't feel cut out to do it)?
And, actually, if you fancy my 'children' for a while, I'd willingly foster them out :::)))
I'm sure you're an excellent parent, Coup, so must decline your offer and I enjoy your insights on tennis; why aren't you at the LTA?
We've had only two decent men in tennis in umpteen years, so football is no comparison. A young Tim Henman took as much as he could from Edberg while the latter lived in London so he knows the value of one player helping to bring along another. I wouldn't know what his optimum continuing role in tennis would be. He turns up at Albert Hall every so often so at some level he is still active. He is utterly useless as a commentator so maybe a racquet in hand is his thing. Like I said, with tennis at the moment we have one or two pearls among swine and continuity matters.