(The 49k is probably a reasonable average, after all, you only need a few 600ks to bump up the average).
Anyone would think the country had never heard of tennis.
The figure given in the 2013 accounts of £16.9 million excluded directors fees. Directors added a further £1.05 million to LTA costs in 2013.
There were more LTA employees in 2013 (324) than 2012 (311) despite the world credit crisis and and a sport in decline. Direct staff costs of £16.9 million included wages, salaries, social security (presumably national insurance) and pension contributions. Get rid of half that lot, capable people though they may be,and you also reduce your indirect overhead considerably too.
The LTA needs to rebuild trust with those who play and help run the sport. Paying high salaries and running a lavish head office operation while expecting the mug punters at the bottom, (on whom any sport depends) to give their time for free is a losing strategy. People see those topline figures or paid junkets to the Australian Open (wives and pets included) and end up voting with their feet.
The current incumbent seems too think UK tennis salvation lies in local authority parks. To build a great tournament structure with playing opportunity for all he has to do that mainly with the clubs because in the main clubs have better, more concentrated facilities and infrastructure. That means devolving power, responsibility and money, once the general plan is decided. One simple incentive is to match the money the clubs raise in tournament prizes. But let the members run those tournaments, for good or bad. Eventually things will work out and the process improves by trial and error. The main thing is to get on with it.
Directors - they're worth it!
Never mind Sepp Blatter might be looking for a job tomorrow
Going back to what's been said earlier, if there's the right funding you can count on 20 James Wards. No amount of funding will guarantee another Andy.
-- Edited by Strongbow on Thursday 28th of May 2015 11:23:57 PM
"No amount of funding will guarantee another Andy".
But fund so that you continue to at least ensure that you have a core of players over different levels, and you provide more realistic aspirations for others - I could be him, I could be ranked 300 or 400 in the world - and from the more players that seriously give it a go some will turn out to be better than they themselves or anyone elae expected. Maybe top 100, maybe higher echelons of the top 100.
As is, with prize money as it is ( though changing to arguable effect ), the domestic tournament structure as it is, the LTA leaning much more towards 'tough love' and focussing on potential 'stars' and it being a financial struggle for your 300 / 400 ranked players, that 300 / 400 ranked aspirant ( who might turn out to be much better ) is liable just to say "**** it, I'll get a proper job".
"No amount of funding will guarantee another Andy".
But fund so that you continue to at least ensure that you have a core of players over different levels, and you provide more realistic aspirations for others - I could be him, I could be ranked 300 or 400 in the world - and from the more players that seriously give it a go some will turn out to be better than they themselves or anyone elae expected. Maybe top 100, maybe higher echelons of the top 100.
As is, with prize money as it is ( though changing to arguable effect ), the domestic tournament structure as it is, the LTA leaning much more towards 'tough love' and focussing on potential 'stars' and it being a financial struggle for your 300 / 400 ranked players, that 300 / 400 ranked aspirant ( who might turn out to be much better ) is liable just to say "**** it, I'll get a proper job".
I fully agree. What I meant was that if the sport was properly funded you would get "good" players - you can only hope that one or two will develop into top 10 players.
However, there doesn't seem any enthusiasm at the LTA to do this. The increases in prize money will help a bit - but not much - and the LTA "Bonus" fund is a complete joke. I don't see the Ferrari dealers rubbing their hands anytime soon.
I've been to tennis in the parks, with small daughter. I'm well off, but live in one of the uk's most deprived postcodes, ch42. Titp works in that the people going wouldn't go to a club. They do go to their parks, and titp gets a good number of local kids, and quite a lot of 40-60s who have never picked up a racket/put it down years ago, and are doing exercise and enjoying it. It may not generate future stars, but is professionally done with a smile and inclusiveness, and is getting kids and adults active. Good job being done imho.
I agree with you. The LTA aren't just there to produce professional players but to improve the participation of in general. In this country we see courts empty all year round until Wimbledon where you can't get a court to save your life and that's not a good situation.
When I was a kid a local coach booked the courts of a local park every saturday afternoon and then put on a tennis clinic. He would charge £2 and you would get an hour (well usually a bit more) of group coaching where there would be some focus on specific shots, tennis drills and some fun tennis games. Every week you would have a good number of kids of all ages and genders attending, at least 25 of them every week. Many of those taking part would turn up atleast an hour early to warm up ano many would stay for a few hours after to keep playing so these courts were full of kids playing tennis for most of the afternoon all year round where as other parks in the area barely had anyone using them.
Later when I joined the local club I was shocked by how little club members actually used the courts, they used the club as a social gathering rather than a place to go play tennis and these are supposed to be the people who enjoy tennis enough to justify the Expense of joining a club.
Simplg put For participation levels outside of wimbledon it's the parks where can happen not the clubs and the more people we have playing tennis for fun from all backgrounds the more likely we are down the line to have more talented sports people choose tennis. Yes better support is needed when they take that route but you need the grass routes of the game in place to get them there in the first place.
It Also so needs to be remembered some of the funding comes from getting general particitation numbers up so it is important also from that point of view
First saw the website several months back so he has been doing this for a while. But his "Ferrer" training course has been getting a lot of publicity for him recently.
Did Andy Bettles retire? Seems he's working with Ana Ivanovic in Beijing to some degree. Came on court for coaching. Is that a new thing? Following in Fitzy's footsteps?
I know that he's not British as such (or at all, indeed) but as many here follow Irish tennis too, and have seen the Irish players a lot at british events etc. etc., here's best wishes to James Cluskey who announced his retirement a couple of days ago.
He's a successful product of US College tennis, starting in Parks tennis, he says, with a CH of 145 (doubles) and lots of doubles titles, including two challengers.
I always though slabba had big potential, good serve, what happened? Did he get injured?
Yes. Got to the 200s in the ranking. Had serious knee problems and dropped back. Because he didn't hit his ranking target that year, the LTA cut his funding and he never really made it back. When I spoke to him about it, he was "disappointed" at the way he had been treated.
It's a real shame for tennis, but no real surprise as everything started going a bit wrong as soon as he moved over to the NTC. A team game will probably suit him more (similar to why he was always better on a doubles court than a singles one, although his tennis was perfect for singles too).