Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 42 - Spain F34 ($10,000) - Melilla (Hard)


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17497
Date:
RE: Week 42 - Spain F34 ($10,000) - Melilla (Hard)


Alex looks like he may be going to play some of the SA clay challengers shortly.

Probably trying to build his ranking up so that he gets in directly or is seeded in qualifying - there is a big financial risk for playing qualifying at challengers.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55709
Date:

According to Mark Taylor (Freya's coach, and Notts Tennis), Alex's score is a 'sausage and egg' score - never heard that one before

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55709
Date:

paulisi wrote:

Alex looks like he may be going to play some of the SA clay challengers shortly.

Probably trying to build his ranking up so that he gets in directly or is seeded in qualifying - there is a big financial risk for playing qualifying at challengers.


 

Good luck to Alex.

But it's a bigger financial risk playing 10ks (unless you've got home lodging) because there's no way you can make a profit unless you win. Whereas at least with challengers you've got a chance.

And Alex was ranked WR 417 in June. Since then, four months ago, he's only played ITFs, nothing else. And is now ranked 385.....

He's at least got space to go up now, as he's dropped his 2015 counters. But it's a hard way to do it and seriously risks injury.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17497
Date:

Alex does win 10K's though and he will pick up prize money if he wins a round which will offset some of the costs.

Why would you play a challenger and the costs associated with the risk of getting no money at all back if you didn't make main draw?

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55709
Date:

paulisi wrote:

Alex does win 10K's though and he will pick up prize money if he wins a round which will offset some of the costs.

Why would you play a challenger and the costs associated with the risk of getting no money at all back if you didn't make main draw?


 

I know what you mean.,

But it's a toss-up bewteen the 10k which is 90% sure to be a loss-maker - although maybe only a moderate loss-maker if you make the semis, say, but with NO upside whatever because even in the 10% chance, say, that you win it , you'll only come out with 100 dollars or so, (pre-witholding tax).

Against playing a Challenger Q which might be 95% sure to be a loss-maker (and a higher loss maker) but gives you a very large upside IF you manage to win a few matches, or - as several of the recent draws have shown - just manage to win one match because the draws have been so thin.

As a financial business thing, the challenger makes far more sense. But with the points thrown in, and match practice etc., it's obvious that there's a need to play the ITFs too.  



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 19403
Date:

paulisi wrote:

Alex looks like he may be going to play some of the SA clay challengers shortly.

Probably trying to build his ranking up so that he gets in directly or is seeded in qualifying - there is a big financial risk for playing qualifying at challengers.


I have seriously looked at trying to get to one of the SA challengers while I am here in Brazil.  With the likelihood not only of Alex playing them, but also Wardy (of the James variety), Kyle and Leon being there, it would be great to get to at least one of them, but the tournaments scheduled for November (Bogota, Guayaquil and Montevideo) couldn't be further away from me if they tried.

Why does South America have to be so big furious



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58345
Date:

SF:  (4) Roberto Ojeda (ESP) WR 434 (CH = 369 in November last year) vs (2) Alex Ward WR 385



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41159
Date:

Chance for Alex in South America to play himself into the Davis Cup side

Re his ranking, as CD says he's now got nothing more to defend this year, and indeed relatively little in the first few months of next year. And although he now has a full set of 18 counters, indicative of just how much he has been playing, the net effect of clearing the lower counters is not very much at all. So much potential rankings upside.



-- Edited by indiana on Thursday 22nd of October 2015 02:45:08 PM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17497
Date:

Alex underway - on serve 2-1*

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17497
Date:

Alex takes the first set 6-4

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 19403
Date:

Alex waltzed through the 2nd set 6-1 and is into the final

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 19403
Date:

SF: (WC) (2) Alex Ward WR 385 beat (4) Roberto Ojeda (ESP) WR 434 (CH = 369 in November last year) 6-4 6-1

Final: (WC) (2) Alex Ward WR 385 v (3) Roberto Ortega Olmeda (ESP) WR 359 (CH 257 Oct 2014)

Chance for Alex to get his own back after his defeat at the hands of Ortega in last weeks semi.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 34418
Date:

Bob in Spain wrote:

SF: (WC) (2) Alex Ward WR 385 beat (4) Roberto Ojeda (ESP) WR 434 (CH = 369 in November last year) 6-4 6-1

Final: (WC) (2) Alex Ward WR 385 v (3) Roberto Ortega Olmeda (ESP) WR 359 (CH 257 Oct 2014)

Chance for Alex to get his own back after his defeat at the hands of Ortega in last weeks semi.


The overall H2H is 2-3 and unusually for a GB v Spain H2H (not to mention unfortunately given the surface here!), Alex is 2-0 on clay, while Ortega is 3-0 on hard.



__________________

GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!

GB top 25s (ranks, whereabouts) & stats - http://www.britishtennis.net/stats.html



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17497
Date:

Alex won the opening tie break.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 19403
Date:

Currently 5-5* in the 2nd

__________________
«First  <  1 2 3  >  Last»  | Page of 3  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard