Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 44 - ATP 1000 - BNP Paribas Masters, Paris (indoor hard)


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 55712
Date:
RE: Week 44 - ATP 1000 - BNP Paribas Masters, Paris (indoor hard)


Stircrazy wrote:
Coup Droit wrote:

Ali has lost the first set 7-6(3)


Don't you mean 6-7(3), CD?


 Nah. 'Fraid we've been down this path before.....smile

I do scores as they get entered in a computer i.e. the winning way round, and mark the winner or loser separately.

Just sometimes I do it the other way round coz I know some people prefer it - but, to me, it's not right and seems really weird



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41159
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:
Coup Droit wrote:

Ali has lost the first set 7-6(3)


Don't you mean 6-7(3), CD?


No, that's just how you and some folk would say it. CD does it that way ( as do I and some others ). It's unambiguous either way with "Ali has lost ..."

We've been here before  



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41159
Date:

Personally, I don't say football teams lost 1-3 and I don't say tennis players, albeit talking about our own, lost 6-7.

Anyway, each to their own  



-- Edited by indiana on Sunday 1st of November 2015 02:36:52 PM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58346
Date:

Aljaz redresses the balance, bagging the second set by 6-2 to take the match into a decider. 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58346
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:
Stircrazy wrote:
Coup Droit wrote:

Ali has lost the first set 7-6(3)


Don't you mean 6-7(3), CD?


[...]  to me, it's not right and seems really weird

Sorry, but  to me it seems equally weird, not to mention illogical, to do it the way you do it!



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 55712
Date:

Yes, I can see that.

But it's the way tennis federations insist you record it.

So it's ingrained and standard. Hence, I prefer it/am used to it like that.

But we can all agree that Ali is one set-all now

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 55712
Date:

indiana wrote:

Personally, I don't say football teams lost 1-3 and I don't say tennis players, albeit talking about our own, lost 6-7.

Anyway, each to their own  



-- Edited by indiana on Sunday 1st of November 2015 02:36:52 PM


 

Yes. Not wishing to prolong it .....  but it's interesting that I think everyone would say 'Chelsea got hammered five nil' and never say 'Chelsea lost nil five'.

So the logic would/should/could be the same for tennis matches.

Seems so to me.

But I can see the other way round.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41159
Date:

And as has been mentioned before the player activity records in the ATP and WTA sites have the ATP doing it one way ( relevant player score first ) and the WTA ( the other, the good way, I mean winner score first ).

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41159
Date:

*5-5, and Aljaz starts the next game with his 19th ace.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58346
Date:

phew-941.gif  Aljaz qualifies!  biggrin   Have to say I feared that JJ might just get the better of him!  That said, there was a flurry of service breaks at the end of the third set, including when Aljaz served for the match at 5-3!

FQR:  (q1) Aljaz Bedene WR 48 defeated (q7) Jerzy Janowicz (POL) WR 60 by 6-7(3) 6-2 7-5

He'll face a fellow qualifier, Big Ivo, GGL, Dimi or Mahut (WC) in the first round of the main draw.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41159
Date:

Yay, Aljaz breaks for 7-5, game, set and match

Into the main draw ...

__________________
Jan


Hall of fame

Status: Online
Posts: 7984
Date:

Hooray!

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58346
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:

phew-941.gif  Aljaz qualifies!  biggrin   Have to say I feared that JJ might just get the better of him!  That said, there was a flurry of service breaks at the end of the third set, including when Aljaz served for the match at 5-3!

FQR:  (q1) Aljaz Bedene WR 48 defeated (q7) Jerzy Janowicz (POL) WR 60 by 6-7(3) 6-2 7-5

He'll face a fellow qualifier, Big Ivo, GGL, Dimi or Mahut (WC) in the first round of the main draw.


And it's a fellow qualifier:

L64:  (Q) Marcel Granollers (ESP) WR 87 (CH = 19 in July 2012) vs (Q) Aljaz Bedene WR 48



__________________


Admin:Moderator + Tennis Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 12091
Date:

YAY! I couldn't follow this, or the Fedal Basel final, because I fell fast asleep at about 2pm after a very bad night. I didn't mean to do it, but there you are.

Very well done by Aljaz, I have to admit I didn't think there was much hope against Janowicz - but as he is a guy I just can't like, I'm doubly delighted

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6988
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:
Stircrazy wrote:

phew-941.gif  Aljaz qualifies!  biggrin   Have to say I feared that JJ might just get the better of him!  That said, there was a flurry of service breaks at the end of the third set, including when Aljaz served for the match at 5-3!

FQR:  (q1) Aljaz Bedene WR 48 defeated (q7) Jerzy Janowicz (POL) WR 60 by 6-7(3) 6-2 7-5

He'll face a fellow qualifier, Big Ivo, GGL, Dimi or Mahut (WC) in the first round of the main draw.


And it's a fellow qualifier:

L64:  (Q) Marcel Granollers (ESP) WR 87 (CH = 19 in July 2012) vs (Q) Aljaz Bedene WR 48


 And the winner of that match gets John Isner.

 



__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4  >  Last»  | Page of 4  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard