As josh Goodall once said to me you have got to love it !
Like anything in life if you don't enjoy it then your unlikely to have success !
I also believe that there is no Gain without pain and personal sacrifice . Liam is clearly more motivated and with less distractions is making good progress .
The direction Sammel is taking Broady short term shows virtually no downside with massive upside potential. The cumulative experience of playing US tournaments last year should stand him in good stead too. Further progress beckons.
I can think of lots of supposedly good reasons - and plenty of "Reach for the Stars" cliches - to support playing 3 ATP events.
And I can also think of lots of supposedly good reasons - and plenty of "One Step at a Time" cliches - to support the alternative of playing three European Challengers.
However ... whatever Liam's eventual outcomes, I somehow doubt that in 15 years' time he'll look back and think: "Those 3 ATP events in early 2015 made a difference to my career".
Que sera, sera
__________________
"Where Ratty leads - the rest soon follow" (Professor Henry Brubaker - The Institute of Studies)
I can think of lots of supposedly good reasons - and plenty of "Reach for the Stars" cliches - to support playing 3 ATP events.
And I can also think of lots of supposedly good reasons - and plenty of "One Step at a Time" cliches - to support the alternative of playing three European Challengers.
However ... whatever Liam's eventual outcomes, I somehow doubt that in 15 years' time he'll look back and think: "Those 3 ATP events in early 2015 made a difference to my career".
Que sera, sera
My bad. 'Better upside' would have been a better way of describing it. I think Sammel wants Broady to bust through as quickly as he can now and sees him as capable of making ATP main tour events.
I don't know about this 'one step at a time' approach beyond playing tennis points themselves. A tennis career is short. When does this approach apply? Che sera, sera is a Dan Evans philosophy.
Clearly not often major, and often very minor, but the choices you make in your career all add up and it's the sum of the many parts - the British cyclists understand the Dave Brailsford philisophy.
In an extremely tight Wimbledon final some years hence it could even be some very small gain from a schedule decision many years before that makes the difference.
Of course luck plays a part in careers ( who you met up with where, indeed where and to whom you were born to etc ) but there are an awful lot of controllables. 'Que sera sera' is a dangerous strategy, in fact it is no stategy at all.
Will Liam's Ranking be good enough to get him into qualifying? Or will he need Wildcards?
No idea, depends who turns up. You get some very strong ATP qualifiers and some where the draw isn't full.
With a ranking inside the top 200 it is inconceivable that Liam won't make it into qualifying of an ATP 250. Last year the last entry into Memphis was WR 1254 while at Delray Beach there were 11 byes.
Acapulco being an ATP 500 is quite so certain as the qualifying draw only includes 16 players but last year the final entry was WR 427 so it shouldn't be a problem.
As josh Goodall once said to me you have got to love it !
Like anything in life if you don't enjoy it then your unlikely to have success !
I also believe that there is no Gain without pain and personal sacrifice . Liam is clearly more motivated and with less distractions is making good progress .