Did not think Jo played poorly (bar a couple of errors and DFs at unfortunate moments) but Petra just had too much power and Jo was not able to keep up.
Am I right in saying if Heather doesnt play before Wimbledon her ranking will drop to outside the top 100?
My prediction that Gaby will finish above Heather may even be closer than year end if thats the case.
You are right. Heather has 185 SF points coming off from Eastbourne last year. She will have to reach the Eastbourne QF this year to have any chance of remaining top 100 in the rankings at the start of Wimbledon ( where she has a further 130 points coming off ).
Am I right in saying if Heather doesnt play before Wimbledon her ranking will drop to outside the top 100?
My prediction that Gaby will finish above Heather may even be closer than year end if thats the case.
You are right. Heather has 185 SF points coming off from Eastbourne last year. She will have to reach the Eastbourne QF this year to have any chance of remaining top 100 in the rankings at the start of Wimbledon ( where she has a further 130 points coming off ).
Heather was playing really well last year. I saw her at Eastbourne against Wosniacki and although she didnt win the match, she had the resilience to come back after a period of struggling and pushed Wosniacki hard. From her performance at Surbiton this year this belief has evaporated. She started brightly but just got brittle when Gabi came back at her. Im not sure if she works with a mental coach but I think it would benefit her in a similar way to JoKo.
So, Mike Dickson in the Daily Mail reports that this event makes an annual loss of over £500,000......
-- Edited by Coup Droit on Thursday 20th of December 2018 03:10:35 PM
I wonder what other WTA tournaments do and if any of them make a profit?
The experience vs Queens is vastly different - Queens has a lot of opportunities for you to spend money. Birmingham, shall we say, does not. Birmingham seems to be much more "I found a marquee in the shed and put it up" compared with Queens.