No idea if it's right but, on tenniswinter's site, it says that Emma will not play any juniors after the US Open (not even junior wimbly next year??? Really??? Find that hard to believe, maybe they just mean regular junior events ........).
The 'not going to college but will go pro' decision seems more likely. And no full-time coach I assume means no dedicated coach.
"Some new Emma Raducanu info:
Not turned pro yet but plans to do so. US Open will be her last junior event.
No full-time coach but has had advice from Nigel Sears.
Got to have dinner at Wimbledon with her idol, Li Na. Feels her playing style is similar."
That's an interesting decision if it's true. I'm surprised as I thought she was quite happy with her school/tennis balance (but I'm only reading that in from her FO interview).
She's well on my radar now, so I'll watch her progress with much interest. It'll be a shame if she doesn't play any more junior GSs, it would be sad if she missed out on winning one.
Interesting if true and I wouldn't be at all surprised it is a pretty sensible way forward and entirely consistent with the way she/her family have done things so far. Most importantly I think she is good enough to go pro at 15, how any GCSE's will be managed I don't know but, and it is an assumption given the school she is/was at she should be very close to the required standard already.
I think a major consideration is avoiding over playing (and perhaps also avoiding all the hype that goes with winning a junior slam). Each step up in difficulty has been very well managed for her, from this point there will only be a small number of junior girls who will challenge her, this means lots of travel and lots of relatively meaningless early rounds from a developmental perspective. By turning pro all games are competitive and there are more options closer to home or she can focus on a string of futures tournaments in Australia the Far East or North America meaning she can play less and get more value.
If you are good and have insight ie total focus on making the WTA tour, turning pro will allow her to develop under the radar until she begins to get main draw Wimbledon wild cards or win through qualifying. Even then it should stay in perspective. It will be interesting to see how things pan out but her career will continue to be very exciting to follow.
Pretty amazing that Leonie Kung has made the final.
She's a qualifier, jwr 509, ch 194.
Admittedly she's top 500 wta.
But still great to see someone who has not focused on juniors doing so well.
All the four semifinalists are ranked inside the WTA top 500, but it is the two Chinese ones that miss out. Iga Swiatek edging two tight sets in the other semi
All the four semifinalists are ranked inside the WTA top 500, but it is the two Chinese ones that miss out. Iga Swiatek edging two tight sets in the other semi
Yes. But the other three are (or were) top juniors too.
Kung is the only one who never bothered. Wonder when the last time a qualifier made the final.....
All the four semifinalists are ranked inside the WTA top 500, but it is the two Chinese ones that miss out. Iga Swiatek edging two tight sets in the other semi
Yes. But the other three are (or were) top juniors too.
Kung is the only one who never bothered. Wonder when the last time a qualifier made the final.....
I didn't know the answer to your question, and didn't have any time to research it yesterday. However the ITF has saved me the bother. Their article on the semis (which also includes quotes from Jack) says that the last qualifier to make the final was Anna Chakvetadze (who went on to a peak WTA ranking of 5) losing the 2003 final to Kirsten Flipkens. The full article is at https://www.itftennis.com/news/288558.aspx
Iga Swiatek wins the girls title - she broke early on, lost the break when serving for the set, but immediately rebroke to take it 6-4. The second set was a comfortable 6-2, converting her first matchpoint
That'll very likely be one of the MDWCs wrapped up already for next year - she's in the top 350 now and there's been a big buzz about her for a while now so I'd be shocked if she wasn't in the top 200 this time next year (and therefore a QWC like the last couple of years wouldn't be needed). Of course, if she is in the top 100 then the WC wouldn't be needed.