Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 14 - ITF M15 - Sharm el-Sheik, Egypt (hard)


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55599
Date:
Week 14 - ITF M15 - Sharm el-Sheik, Egypt (hard)


Without being rude, Adam Jones has a slamdunk first round draw - against the guy who Giacomo Revelli beat 6-1 6-0, and is in the draw as a wildcard, having lost in his first round every time in recent history.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58152
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:

L32:  Luke Johnson WR 689 (CH = 671 last November) vs (5) Makoto Ochi (JPN) WR 457 (CH = 343 in April 2019)

L32:  (6) Paul Jubb WR 494 (CH = 427 in July 2019) vs (WC) Preston Connor (IRL) UNR


L32:  (Q) Sean Hodkin WR 1253 vs Andrew Paulson (CZE) WR 705 (CH =704 last month)

L32:  (WC) Da-Niel Kotze (RSA) UNR vs (Q) Adam Jones UNR

L32:  Francesco Vilardo (ITA) WR 699 (CH = 413 in July 2016) vs (Q) Daniel Cox UNR

 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58152
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:

Without being rude, Adam Jones has a slamdunk first round draw [...]


Don't tempt fate, CD...



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55599
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:
Coup Droit wrote:

Without being rude, Adam Jones has a slamdunk first round draw [...]


Don't tempt fate, CD...


Don't believe in it smile

Of course Adam might lose.

But that still won't contradict the fact he had a slamdunk match....



__________________


Top national player

Status: Offline
Posts: 3391
Date:

Blimey makes a change all 3 qualifying, it's usually the reverse.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55599
Date:

Oops !

L16: Kosuke Ogura & Issei Okamura (JPN/JPN) CR 2456 (1579+877) def. (2) Luke Johnson & Francesco Vilardo (ITA) CR 963 (420+533) 36 7-6(2) 10-5

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55599
Date:

And the Japanese get the upper hand again....

L16: (WC) Sean Hodkin & Adam Jones UNR (1215+0) lost to Makoto Ochi & Yuta Shimizu (JPN/JPN) CR 1532 (929+603) 2-6 5-7

__________________


Masters Series Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 3823
Date:

Couple of bagels for Paul over the Wildcard from Ireland.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55599
Date:

Luke was a clear outsider here but really creamed it

L32: Luke Johnson WR 689 def. (5) Makoto Ochi (JPN) WR 457 6-2 6-1

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58152
Date:

The story so far:

L32:  Luke Johnson WR 689 defeated (5) Makoto Ochi (JPN) WR 457 by 2 & 1 

L32:  (6) Paul Jubb WR 494 defeated (WC) Preston Connor (IRL) UNR by 0 & 0  smile



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58152
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:

The story so far:

L32:  Luke Johnson WR 689 defeated (5) Makoto Ochi (JPN) WR 457 by 2 & 1 

L32:  (6) Paul Jubb WR 494 defeated (WC) Preston Connor (IRL) UNR by 0 & 0  smile


L32:  Francesco Vilardo (ITA) WR 699 defeated (Q) Daniel Cox UNR by 4 & 4



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58152
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:
Stircrazy wrote:

The story so far:

L32:  Luke Johnson WR 689 defeated (5) Makoto Ochi (JPN) WR 457 by 2 & 1 

L32:  (6) Paul Jubb WR 494 defeated (WC) Preston Connor (IRL) UNR by 0 & 0  smile


L32:  Francesco Vilardo (ITA) WR 699 defeated (Q) Daniel Cox UNR by 4 & 4


L32:  (Q) Adam Jones UNR defeated (WC) Da-Niel Kotze (RSA) UNR by 2 & 1

*****

L16:  (Q) Adam Jones UNR vs (3) Alessandro Bega (ITA) WR 360 (CH = 269 in July 2016)



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55599
Date:

Well done, Adam - never in doubt

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58152
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:

Well done, Adam - never in doubt


And I never underestimate a British sportsman's or woman's ability to snatch defeat from the jaws of (expected) victory.  wink



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55599
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:
Coup Droit wrote:

Well done, Adam - never in doubt


And I never underestimate a British sportsman's or woman's ability to snatch defeat from the jaws of (expected) victory.  wink


Yes, but it's easy to say 'of course they might lose'. It gives an out. It just covers bases. Because it's obviously true, overall. And everything can be hedged in 'ifs and ands'.

So it's important, I reckon, to be 'brave' and committed at times.  

 



__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4 5  >  Last»  | Page of 5  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard