Ironic to mention that golf doesn't have interviews, then why does it has special press conferences and nation wide mandatory apologies when tiger woods is unfaithful?
They aren't mandatory, nor golf related.
Americans have different standards for the humility required of some people for some events.
I'd imagine Tiger Woods wouldn't have openly selected to plaster his personal business all over the tv and news outlets. Are any of the drug cheats ever called in to publicly apologize on national tv in front of the world I ask?
You' are mixing issues, junior. It was a standard tennis post match PC that Musetti was giving - not being specially called to account - and that is the main disagreement here, about whether we should have these and the on court ones. Whether they are more trouble than they are worth.
I was answering the golf/tennis comparison. Maybe Musetti should have just spoken in Italian, doesn't seem like the tanker type for me. If you're problem is with players "tanking" or not performing to high standards when losing, you've picked the wrong sport Indy, I spend my life trying to train players to play well/find solutions when things aren't going well, the default setting most players come to is to stop/quit than do the hard work. Have the on court/after match interviews been part of the sport for a long time? yes. Will they continue to be goinf forward? also yes, its not going to change because one player in the world suddenly decides she doesn't want to do them. You're flogging a dead horse here, so moving on in sport and life .....
Sorry, junior, when you were really just responding to Chris's rather tangental golf points ( and edit: to be fair to you both thus is the men's FO thread rather than women's FO thread where most of the tennis post match interview discussion has been ).
On tennis, I have not been considering tanking at all. And my understanding is that Musettii didn't appear to do that at all before throwing in the towel because he wasn't winning points and didn't see that changing. And I personally have not been overcritical of that.
Again, speaking in a foreign language may indeed be an issue at times. It wasn't here as to why he retired.
I'm not sure at all why you are aiming "You're flogging a dead horse" at me when I have bern arguing in favour of post natch interviews . And I agrlree that they will no doubt continue. Keep up
-- Edited by indiana on Thursday 10th of June 2021 05:52:10 PM
Ha, I just watched the end of the 3rd set on bet365 without commentary when the players then left and a guy addressed the crowd. My French is not good.
Were boos as he started, he seemed to ask to be heard out and then there was an explosion of cheers. So I'd kinda guessed.
Always good for honest tennis when Old Sweaty's grinding one-dimensional game is found out! No doubt the fake humility will be followed by the latest injury woes which, hopefully, will cause him to miss the grass season!
-- Edited by Bagel on Friday 11th of June 2021 09:33:11 PM
-- Edited by Bagel on Friday 11th of June 2021 09:34:01 PM
Ive not seen a shot all fortnight bar some highlights so totally blind. It sounds like Novak v Rafa was a cracker , was it? Novak v Tsitsipas, could be a cracker also but Novak must go in favourite. That said, tennis abstract rates it v close 53 v 47 from memory
It probably is worth belatedly recording that a Serbian chap won the final, coming back from 2 sets down.
He is up to 19 Slam titles so now just one behind the Swiss and Spanish fellas. And apparently the first guy to win all 4 Slams at least twice in the open era.