Closer than I expected but, yep, I got my predicted Will v Phoenix final. And now am still on Phoenix for the title.
As Tennisdad says, and has been mentioned quite a bit over the past year or two, our crop of younger girls is very exciting. Yes, it's MILES too early, really, to get truly excited - so many things can happen. BUT it's the first time that we've had such depth in an area in the girls for a while. It's rather similar to the 2001 boys crop (although maybe better) - there's a couple of headline acts and a very good supporting cast. (And I'm not even counting Hannah in this, who is in a class of her own and not the same cohort).
I've enjoyed the past two years watching ones like Hep and Mimi come on, and adding new ones to the list. Fingers crossed it goes on......
Why on earth are they playing the two finals tomorrow at the same time and at 9 am. I realise this isnt a big spectator event, but just for the players sense of occasion etc, having them one after the other would surely be better - and not starting at the silly early hour of 9 am on a Friday - surely they could have had finals at say 10 and NB 1130 or even 11 and NB 1230?
Why on earth are they playing the two finals tomorrow at the same time and at 9 am. I realise this isnt a big spectator event, but just for the players sense of occasion etc, having them one after the other would surely be better - and not starting at the silly early hour of 9 am on a Friday - surely they could have had finals at say 10 and NB 1130 or even 11 and NB 1230?
Why on earth are they playing the two finals tomorrow at the same time and at 9 am. I realise this isnt a big spectator event, but just for the players sense of occasion etc, having them one after the other would surely be better - and not starting at the silly early hour of 9 am on a Friday - surely they could have had finals at say 10 and NB 1130 or even 11 and NB 1230?
Why on earth are they playing the two finals tomorrow at the same time and at 9 am. I realise this isnt a big spectator event, but just for the players sense of occasion etc, having them one after the other would surely be better - and not starting at the silly early hour of 9 am on a Friday - surely they could have had finals at say 10 and NB 1130 or even 11 and NB 1230?
You hardly get any casual spectators anyway at juniors bar a few High profile events. It's just family and friends and coaches
How does that compare with other countries? Is more effort made to attract more general interest in some countries?
Well, in France, they're hardly grandstand events but they often do get quite a good following, depending rather on the local club, how dynamic it is, it's size, the sponsors etc.
(Obviously, I'm talking about the normal events, not the Petits As, say, which has hundreds of spectators each day).
I agree with Jon - although after the utterly and unbelievably feeble effort of Nottingham for the women's 25k final, with a GB woman playing (Eden), I guess this is not the worst. (Truly shocking, IMO)
I don't go with Lambda's 'you've got to hurry to give them back' argument - having had the courts all week, I don't see that 3 hours makes any difference - well, of course, it could but that's a*se about face, IMO - ruin your finals for the sake of a slither of time.
You hardly get any casual spectators anyway at juniors bar a few High profile events. It's just family and friends and coaches
How does that compare with other countries? Is more effort made to attract more general interest in some countries?
Well, in France, they're hardly grandstand events but they often do get quite a good following, depending rather on the local club, how dynamic it is, it's size, the sponsors etc.
(Obviously, I'm talking about the normal events, not the Petits As, say, which has hundreds of spectators each day).
I agree with Jon - although after the utterly and unbelievably feeble effort of Nottingham for the women's 25k final, with a GB woman playing (Eden), I guess this is not the worst. (Truly shocking, IMO)
I don't go with Lambda's 'you've got to hurry to give them back' argument - having had the courts all week, I don't see that 3 hours makes any difference - well, of course, it could but that's a*se about face, IMO - ruin your finals for the sake of a slither of time.
Definitely agree - it is a world ranking event at a level that is like a Challenger in main tour, and for some of these kids it could be the highlight of their career, not just to date but ever...so it should have some pomp and some attention - even if no fans, it should have "attention" (ie not be against another final) and a decent time, and definitely umpires and ballkids etc