Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 17 - ATP Challenger 80 - Rome, Italy (outdoor clay)


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 55578
Date:
Week 17 - ATP Challenger 80 - Rome, Italy (outdoor clay)


Well, it was quite a good match-up - and the sunshine and the crowd and the home-boy youngster doing well - I'm happy to let the Italians have their day

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 13910
Date:

L16: (WC) Giulio Zeppieri (ITA) WR 229 beat (2) Jack Draper WR 124 6-1 6-4

__________________
GBJ


Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 777
Date:

Itd be interesting to look back at all the break points in that match to see what the difference was. Jack lost all 8 bps he created and 3 of the 4 he faced so 11/12 of the bps in the match! You could argue that if hed won even half of those hed have won comfortably! Works out conveniently if his first Madrid masters match is Saturday though - travel today practice tomorrow, play the next day- so you argue its better he lost and that other than playing big poorly this is still an encouraging performance.

__________________
GBJ


Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 777
Date:

www.atptour.com/en/atp-challenger-tour/challenger-tv/challenger-tv-search-results/all/2022/2151/all If anyone feels like looking back themselves and reporting what they notice on those bps :)

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41032
Date:

I've not looked back and haven't seen a point by point recap. But it does to an extent depend on how these BPs were spread out. Taken to the extreme, if all 8 of Jack's BP opportunities were in one return game then that was the only game in which he had any BP opportunity.

I guess more interesting would be the second set which was the much closer one in games.



__________________
GBJ


Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 777
Date:

indiana wrote:

I've not looked back and haven't seen a point by point recap. But it does to an extent depend on how these BPs were spread out. Taken to the extreme, if all 8 of Jack's BP opportunities were in one return game then that was the only game in which he had any BP opportunity.

I guess more interesting would be the second set which was the much closer one in games.


 He was in a lot of his service games in the first set and could easily have gone 3or 4-0 up. The bps were well spread 



__________________


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1842
Date:

First set he failed to take 3 BPs in game 1, 2 in game 5 and 2 in game 7

Faced 2 in the second game, one in the sixth.

Second set faced one in the fifth, had one in the sixth.

__________________
«First  <  1 2 | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard