The question that comes to mind, is this poll to determine a winning voter, or a winning player? Since the actual players probably have no inkling of this competition, and they do not receive any material gain from it, I'd say it's a poll to determine a winning voter.
If that's deemed to be the case, then the player pool automatically shrinks to those that received at least one vote, does it not? Ideally, we'd have enough votes so all listed players would have collected a vote, but it is, what it is.
Therefore, isn't it still possible that all the British "Wimbledon main draw" players (with at least one vote) could affect the outcome of this poll competition?
The question that comes to mind, is this poll to determine a winning voter, or a winning player? Since the actual players probably have no inkling of this competition, and they do not receive any material gain from it, I'd say it's a poll to determine a winning voter.
If that's deemed to be the case, then the player pool automatically shrinks to those that received at least one vote, does it not? Ideally, we'd have enough votes so all listed players would have collected a vote, but it is, what it is.
Therefore, isn't it still possible that all the British "Wimbledon main draw" players (with at least one vote) could affect the outcome of this poll competition?
The aim of the poll is to find a winning voter, yes, but its also to track and see who the winning player is and try and create some fun and interest.
I'm in 100% aggreement re. the fun aspect, and I don't care if I'm first or last, but I was just trying to breathe some more life into the poll, as it seems to me to be still not yet done and dusted.
I'm in 100% aggreement re. the fun aspect, and I don't care if I'm first or last, but I was just trying to breathe some more life into the poll, as it seems to me to be still not yet done and dusted.
And thats always welcomed !
the mens equivalent of course is much closer and also has 4 extra weeks to run that could throw it all up in the air. Hope the LTA take note for next year on the womens side !
I'm in 100% aggreement re. the fun aspect, and I don't care if I'm first or last, but I was just trying to breathe some more life into the poll, as it seems to me to be still not yet done and dusted.
Certainly about winning voters ( though yes interesting to see all the players' match win totals ). But I guess it's been looked at that to be declared a winner you have to have voted for the player that has or shares most wins.
So if that player is ultimately Jodie then none of us win? But there remains outside chances for a few voters.