Well done, Andy, eased through it eventually - from 3-0 down it was 6-1 6-3 so not too bad
How could he possibly have been 0-3 in the first set & then won it by 6-1!
Sorry, i meant in terms of games from that point it was 6-1 (making the set 6-4 as he was 0-3 down). So he gave the guy an effective head start and then mopped up comfortably
Well done, Andy, eased through it eventually - from 3-0 down it was 6-1 6-3 so not too bad
How could he possibly have been 0-3 in the first set & then won it by 6-1!
Sorry, i meant in terms of games from that point it was 6-1 (making the set 6-4 as he was 0-3 down). So he gave the guy an effective head start and then mopped up comfortably
Does that make sense?!
Nice comeback. Squirmed your way out of that one LOL
Well done, Andy, eased through it eventually - from 3-0 down it was 6-1 6-3 so not too bad
How could he possibly have been 0-3 in the first set & then won it by 6-1!
Sorry, i meant in terms of games from that point it was 6-1 (making the set 6-4 as he was 0-3 down). So he gave the guy an effective head start and then mopped up comfortably
Well done, Andy, eased through it eventually - from 3-0 down it was 6-1 6-3 so not too bad
How could he possibly have been 0-3 in the first set & then won it by 6-1!
Sorry, i meant in terms of games from that point it was 6-1 (making the set 6-4 as he was 0-3 down). So he gave the guy an effective head start and then mopped up comfortably
Does that make sense?!
Nice comeback. Squirmed your way out of that one LOL
Well done, Andy, eased through it eventually - from 3-0 down it was 6-1 6-3 so not too bad
How could he possibly have been 0-3 in the first set & then won it by 6-1!
Sorry, i meant in terms of games from that point it was 6-1 (making the set 6-4 as he was 0-3 down). So he gave the guy an effective head start and then mopped up comfortably
Does that make sense?!
Er, no.
oh...mmm.
So, Andy went 0-3 down, ok, I think we are agreed on that.
From that point, he won the rest of the games in that set 6 to 1...does that explain!
L32: Andy Murray WR 68 defeated (Q) Christopher O'Connell (AUS) WR 116 by 4 & 3
Kudla (again!) or Bublik (7) in the last 16.
L16: Andy Murray WR 68 vs (7) Alexander Bublik (KAZ) WR 42 (CH = 30 in February)
Andy leads the head-to-head by 2-1. Bublik won their last encounter in Indian Wells earlier this year in straight sets (last 64), while Andy won in Rotterdam, also earlier this year (first round, straight sets) & in the first round at Wimbledon in 2017, again in straight sets.