Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 23 - ATP 250 - Boss Open - Stuttgart, Germany (grass)


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 42389
Date:
Week 23 - ATP 250 - Boss Open - Stuttgart, Germany (grass)


Order of play tomorrow here is Shapo, Struff (local), Murray, Tsitsipas, Kyrgios

Thats a line up any 250 would swoon over .

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 42389
Date:

JonH comes home wrote:

Order of play tomorrow here is Shapo, Struff (local), Murray, Tsitsipas, Kyrgios

Thats a line up any 250 would swoon over .


 Sorry, seems to have changed - it is Shapo, Murray, Tsitsipas, Kyrgios.

Ok, it is a 250, but I mean, really? 

If you had Centre Court tickets you'd be delighted with that line up!!

 



-- Edited by JonH comes home on Thursday 9th of June 2022 12:40:53 PM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 42389
Date:

Andy well on top, 6-3 2-1 with a break. Shows how fickle tennis is - Kudla beat Andy, Bublik beat Kudla, hopefully ....

__________________
Jan


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 7970
Date:

Eek, please stop counting chickens Jon!
Andy battling at *2-5 in the second.

 

edit - ok I'm breathing a little more easily now. 5-5*



-- Edited by Jan on Thursday 9th of June 2022 01:19:36 PM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58126
Date:

L16:  Andy Murray WR 68 defeated (7) Alexander Bublik (KAZ) WR 42 by 6-3 7-6(4)  biggrin

Tsitsipas (WC/1) or the Swiss qualifier, Dominic Stricker, in the QF.



__________________
Jan


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 7970
Date:

Phew!

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41027
Date:

Fickle tennis    - which of course makes it so much more interesting.

Anyway, got there thankfully.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 42389
Date:

Jan wrote:

Eek, please stop counting chickens Jon!
Andy battling at *2-5 in the second.

 

edit - ok I'm breathing a little more easily now. 5-5*



-- Edited by Jan on Thursday 9th of June 2022 01:19:36 PM


 i never had a doubt, Jan



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 42389
Date:

indiana wrote:

Fickle tennis    - which of course makes it so much more interesting.

Anyway, got there thankfully.


 Yep, you've heard of Padel Tennis, next up is Fickle Tennisbiggrin



__________________
Jan


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 7970
Date:

JonH comes home wrote:
Jan wrote:

Eek, please stop counting chickens Jon!
Andy battling at *2-5 in the second.

 

edit - ok I'm breathing a little more easily now. 5-5*



-- Edited by Jan on Thursday 9th of June 2022 01:19:36 PM


 i never had a doubt, Jan


 biggrin



__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4586
Date:

I have a hunch that Andy will beat Tsitsipas tomorrow and then lose a close semi to Nick. Berretini v Nick final. 



-- Edited by Jaggy1876 on Thursday 9th of June 2022 02:01:33 PM

__________________


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1834
Date:

I was looking at Andy's ranking points and I have to say the ATP make it very difficult to understand. Can anyone please explain why Andy has to include a mandatory zero counter for Roland Garros where he didn't play, but doesn't have to count last year's US Open where he lost in the first round?

__________________


Lower Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 247
Date:

SuperT wrote:

I was looking at Andy's ranking points and I have to say the ATP make it very difficult to understand. Can anyone please explain why Andy has to include a mandatory zero counter for Roland Garros where he didn't play, but doesn't have to count last year's US Open where he lost in the first round?


 Because he was a wildcard? 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 42389
Date:

SuperT wrote:

I was looking at Andy's ranking points and I have to say the ATP make it very difficult to understand. Can anyone please explain why Andy has to include a mandatory zero counter for Roland Garros where he didn't play, but doesn't have to count last year's US Open where he lost in the first round?


 im guessing but presumably he was high enough ranked for the FO to be in as of right if he had chosen to play and that high enough ranking made it mandatory. As Brendan F says, he wasnt high enough ranked for USO, he got a WC and as such that would mean it isnt mandatory? 



__________________


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1834
Date:

Thank you Brendan and Jon. I knew someone on here would know the answer - you lot really are brilliant.

__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 46  >  Last»  | Page of 6  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard