SF: (7) Henry Patten WR 550 vs (6) Stuart Parker WR 498
Sorry CD. But for reasons I won't elaborate on, I have to go with Henry on this one
Can't for the life of me think why.....
Despite being lower ranked, Henry was actually the favourite with the betting sites yesterday (1.66 v 2.13) (probably because he beat Ali whereas Stuart 'only' beat James Story). But it's now spot one evens
Actually, although Stuart is 'my man' just because he was going along under everyone's radar playing only in France, I actually really enjoyed watching Henry's match live against Jansen. And his match against Ali on livestream. And haven't seen any of Stuart playing here.
So no idea about what the odds should be, and I was surprised yesterday, but I feel like I'm 'behind' Henry in this event
When it's all-GB, I can be pretty happy whatever happens
Stuart is 2-0 h2h on Henry, both this year on hardcourts, one indoor, one out.
but I fancy Henry to win today on the grass. And Mark W as well.
is it less hot in UK today - its been hotter there than where we are on holiday!
Surely Julian and Henry can leave behind the 25K level given their ranking rise and start to aim bigger. We already know they can win at challenger level.
Yes, but what are their singles ambitions, Henry in particular, and what could they realistically expect to get out of challengers in that respect, even if they could get into singles qualifying?
I think mixing it up seems to make sense for the time being.
Plus Bob might need Henry to get into his singles top 500 quota
First set and a break for Henry - with his doubles success on grass and watching him play, grass seems like a friend to Henry. Not surprised he is showing well here
Surely Julian and Henry can leave behind the 25K level given their ranking rise and start to aim bigger. We already know they can win at challenger level.
As Indy says, what about singles?
I'm with Jaggy (amazingly ) - players (who physically can) should always keep their singles going, at least to give it a good go, before - maybe - dropping it later to concentrate solely on doubles
Henry and Julian are both very new to the fulltime pro tour - playing this event is perfect for their singles and it's hardy as though they've been cruising it in the doubles - they only won their first match 10-7 in the MTB
My own view - as before - is that Julian's doubles is significantly better than his singles, which has certain major weaknesses which it's unlikely he's going to really get round, and it's not really worth it - doubles is a better route (rather like Joe S, really)
However, Henry (and others) has more singles qualities and may well wish to work on those and at least give it a real go - he may well find (like Lloyd G say) that he plateaus out in singles and doubles gives him more scope - but at least he'll have really tried
Agree he needs to play singles and thus their doubles for now must follow their singles entry- even if this means the pair going separate directions for now.