Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Weeks 12 & 13 - ATP Masters 1000 - Itau Open - Miami, FL, USA - doubles


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 42343
Date:
RE: Weeks 12 & 13 - ATP Masters 1000 - Itau Open - Miami, FL, USA - doubles


indiana wrote:
JonH comes home wrote:
Stircrazy wrote:

QF:  Nathaniel Lammons & Jackson Withrow (USA/USA) CR 83 (41+42) defeated (5) Lloyd Glasspool & Harri Heliövaara (FIN) CR 25 (13+12) by 7-6(3) 3-6 [11-9]  bleh


 No! 5 points to nil?! Thats ridiculous . 


confuse

Well, 7 points to 2 from Lammon & Withrow being *4-7.( 1 mini break down ) to winning the MTB 11-9. They won their final 5 service points and 2 out of 4 return points which while very disappointing for Lloyd & Harri, just based on these points scores is not ridiculous. Not that I even think 5-0 would have been, depending on how the points played out.

Pity.


 Actually Id remembered they were 9-6 up and hence said 5-0. That is Julian of course. 

ridiculous as not so much they are ridiculous , the situation is given how it stopped overnight. Although I do think they should let loose 7 out of 9 points ! 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 42343
Date:

JonH comes home wrote:
indiana wrote:
JonH comes home wrote:
Stircrazy wrote:

QF:  Nathaniel Lammons & Jackson Withrow (USA/USA) CR 83 (41+42) defeated (5) Lloyd Glasspool & Harri Heliövaara (FIN) CR 25 (13+12) by 7-6(3) 3-6 [11-9]  bleh


 No! 5 points to nil?! Thats ridiculous . 


confuse

Well, 7 points to 2 from Lammon & Withrow being *4-7.( 1 mini break down ) to winning the MTB 11-9. They won their final 5 service points and 2 out of 4 return points which while very disappointing for Lloyd & Harri, just based on these points scores is not ridiculous. Not that I even think 5-0 would have been, depending on how the points played out.

Pity.


 Actually Id remembered they were 9-6 up and hence said 5-0. That is Julian of course. 

ridiculous as not so much they are ridiculous , the situation is given how it stopped overnight. Although I do think they should let loose 7 out of 9 points ! 


 So the ridiculous was at the situation on the assumption they had lost 5 straight points and were 3 match points up!



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6871
Date:

JonH comes home wrote:
JonH comes home wrote:
indiana wrote:
JonH comes home wrote:
Stircrazy wrote:

QF:  Nathaniel Lammons & Jackson Withrow (USA/USA) CR 83 (41+42) defeated (5) Lloyd Glasspool & Harri Heliövaara (FIN) CR 25 (13+12) by 7-6(3) 3-6 [11-9]  bleh


 No! 5 points to nil?! Thats ridiculous . 


confuse

Well, 7 points to 2 from Lammon & Withrow being *4-7.( 1 mini break down ) to winning the MTB 11-9. They won their final 5 service points and 2 out of 4 return points which while very disappointing for Lloyd & Harri, just based on these points scores is not ridiculous. Not that I even think 5-0 would have been, depending on how the points played out.

Pity.


 Actually Id remembered they were 9-6 up and hence said 5-0. That is Julian of course. 

ridiculous as not so much they are ridiculous , the situation is given how it stopped overnight. Although I do think they should let loose 7 out of 9 points ! 


 So the ridiculous was at the situation on the assumption they had lost 5 straight points and were 3 match points up!


 Seems a bit weird confuse



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41014
Date:

In the GB slayers' SF, Gonzalez & Roger- Vasselin pipped Lammons & Withrow 6-4 5-7 [12-10]

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 42343
Date:

Strongbow wrote:
JonH comes home wrote:
JonH comes home wrote:
indiana wrote:
JonH comes home wrote:
Stircrazy wrote:

QF:  Nathaniel Lammons & Jackson Withrow (USA/USA) CR 83 (41+42) defeated (5) Lloyd Glasspool & Harri Heliövaara (FIN) CR 25 (13+12) by 7-6(3) 3-6 [11-9]  bleh


 No! 5 points to nil?! Thats ridiculous . 


confuse

Well, 7 points to 2 from Lammon & Withrow being *4-7.( 1 mini break down ) to winning the MTB 11-9. They won their final 5 service points and 2 out of 4 return points which while very disappointing for Lloyd & Harri, just based on these points scores is not ridiculous. Not that I even think 5-0 would have been, depending on how the points played out.

Pity.


 Actually Id remembered they were 9-6 up and hence said 5-0. That is Julian of course. 

ridiculous as not so much they are ridiculous , the situation is given how it stopped overnight. Although I do think they should let loose 7 out of 9 points ! 


 So the ridiculous was at the situation on the assumption they had lost 5 straight points and were 3 match points up!


 Seems a bit weird confuse


 basically I had mixed their situation up with Julian and thought they lost 5 straight points - and was angry at a situation that had them (or Julian) going in overnight at 9-6 in an MTB and losing - just got myself confused. 

Not that weird Strongbow, but thanks for your support and understanding! 



__________________


Strong Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 474
Date:

indiana wrote:

In the GB slayers' SF, Gonzalez & Roger- Vasselin pipped Lammons & Withrow 6-4 5-7 [12-10]


 The finalists are aged 39, 40 and 41, with Krajiczk the spring chicken at 32.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 42343
Date:

miriam abc wrote:
indiana wrote:

In the GB slayers' SF, Gonzalez & Roger- Vasselin pipped Lammons & Withrow 6-4 5-7 [12-10]


 The finalists are aged 39, 40 and 41, with Krajiczk the spring chicken at 32.


 And ERV and Gonzalez won the title



__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4 | Page of 4  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard