QF: Nathaniel Lammons & Jackson Withrow (USA/USA) CR 83 (41+42) defeated (5) Lloyd Glasspool & Harri Heliövaara (FIN) CR 25 (13+12) by 7-6(3) 3-6 [11-9]
No! 5 points to nil?! Thats ridiculous .
Well, 7 points to 2 from Lammon & Withrow being *4-7.( 1 mini break down ) to winning the MTB 11-9. They won their final 5 service points and 2 out of 4 return points which while very disappointing for Lloyd & Harri, just based on these points scores is not ridiculous. Not that I even think 5-0 would have been, depending on how the points played out.
Pity.
Actually Id remembered they were 9-6 up and hence said 5-0. That is Julian of course.
ridiculous as not so much they are ridiculous , the situation is given how it stopped overnight. Although I do think they should let loose 7 out of 9 points !
QF: Nathaniel Lammons & Jackson Withrow (USA/USA) CR 83 (41+42) defeated (5) Lloyd Glasspool & Harri Heliövaara (FIN) CR 25 (13+12) by 7-6(3) 3-6 [11-9]
No! 5 points to nil?! Thats ridiculous .
Well, 7 points to 2 from Lammon & Withrow being *4-7.( 1 mini break down ) to winning the MTB 11-9. They won their final 5 service points and 2 out of 4 return points which while very disappointing for Lloyd & Harri, just based on these points scores is not ridiculous. Not that I even think 5-0 would have been, depending on how the points played out.
Pity.
Actually Id remembered they were 9-6 up and hence said 5-0. That is Julian of course.
ridiculous as not so much they are ridiculous , the situation is given how it stopped overnight. Although I do think they should let loose 7 out of 9 points !
So the ridiculous was at the situation on the assumption they had lost 5 straight points and were 3 match points up!
QF: Nathaniel Lammons & Jackson Withrow (USA/USA) CR 83 (41+42) defeated (5) Lloyd Glasspool & Harri Heliövaara (FIN) CR 25 (13+12) by 7-6(3) 3-6 [11-9]
No! 5 points to nil?! Thats ridiculous .
Well, 7 points to 2 from Lammon & Withrow being *4-7.( 1 mini break down ) to winning the MTB 11-9. They won their final 5 service points and 2 out of 4 return points which while very disappointing for Lloyd & Harri, just based on these points scores is not ridiculous. Not that I even think 5-0 would have been, depending on how the points played out.
Pity.
Actually Id remembered they were 9-6 up and hence said 5-0. That is Julian of course.
ridiculous as not so much they are ridiculous , the situation is given how it stopped overnight. Although I do think they should let loose 7 out of 9 points !
So the ridiculous was at the situation on the assumption they had lost 5 straight points and were 3 match points up!
QF: Nathaniel Lammons & Jackson Withrow (USA/USA) CR 83 (41+42) defeated (5) Lloyd Glasspool & Harri Heliövaara (FIN) CR 25 (13+12) by 7-6(3) 3-6 [11-9]
No! 5 points to nil?! Thats ridiculous .
Well, 7 points to 2 from Lammon & Withrow being *4-7.( 1 mini break down ) to winning the MTB 11-9. They won their final 5 service points and 2 out of 4 return points which while very disappointing for Lloyd & Harri, just based on these points scores is not ridiculous. Not that I even think 5-0 would have been, depending on how the points played out.
Pity.
Actually Id remembered they were 9-6 up and hence said 5-0. That is Julian of course.
ridiculous as not so much they are ridiculous , the situation is given how it stopped overnight. Although I do think they should let loose 7 out of 9 points !
So the ridiculous was at the situation on the assumption they had lost 5 straight points and were 3 match points up!
Seems a bit weird
basically I had mixed their situation up with Julian and thought they lost 5 straight points - and was angry at a situation that had them (or Julian) going in overnight at 9-6 in an MTB and losing - just got myself confused.
Not that weird Strongbow, but thanks for your support and understanding!