Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Weeks 19 & 20 - ATP Masters 1000 - Internazionali BNL d'Italia Open - Rome, Italy (clay) - SINGLES ONLY


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 42337
Date:
Weeks 19 & 20 - ATP Masters 1000 - Internazionali BNL d'Italia Open - Rome, Italy (clay)


If Dan wins today he will be live ranked 22, equalling his career high

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18692
Date:

Dan led 5-2* but RCB eventually took the first set on a tiebreak, after lengthy rain delays. Dan edged a tough second set by breaking in the 11th game and saving 2 break back points to take it 7-5

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58090
Date:

L64:  Roberto Carballés (ESP) WR 51 defeated (20) Daniel Evans WR 24 by 7-6(5) 5-7 6-4  cry

Very close match, which lasted for just over three & three-quarter hours. hmm

 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 42337
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:

L64:  Roberto Carballés (ESP) WR 51 defeated (20) Daniel Evans WR 24 by 7-6(5) 5-7 6-4  cry

Very close match, which lasted for just over three & three-quarter hours. hmm

 


 Was that the actual match time or the elapsed time with rain delays? 



__________________


Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1791
Date:

It was a very, very long match. I'm not sure exactly how accurate the ATP figures are, but I wasted the largest part of my day watching.  The DIY stuff will have to wait til next w/e!



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58090
Date:

JonH comes home wrote:
Stircrazy wrote:

L64:  Roberto Carballés (ESP) WR 51 defeated (20) Daniel Evans WR 24 by 7-6(5) 5-7 6-4  cry

Very close match, which lasted for just over three & three-quarter hours. hmm


 Was that the actual match time or the elapsed time with rain delays? 


My comment was based on what was shown on the ATP web site.  I assumed, therefore, that it was the actual playing time which took no account of any time lost to the weather.  I have now checked the tournment web site & it shows "3H46'".  



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 42337
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:
JonH comes home wrote:
Stircrazy wrote:

L64:  Roberto Carballés (ESP) WR 51 defeated (20) Daniel Evans WR 24 by 7-6(5) 5-7 6-4  cry

Very close match, which lasted for just over three & three-quarter hours. hmm


 Was that the actual match time or the elapsed time with rain delays? 


My comment was based on what was shown on the ATP web site.  I assumed, therefore, that it was the actual playing time which took no account of any time lost to the weather.  I have now checked the tournment web site & it shows "3H46'".  


 Indeed- and Jose Morgado comments on how long it was in his twitter feed; brutally slow conditions he comments on as well 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 42337
Date:

Cam leading comfortably so far and a match v Djokovic hopefully awaits

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58090
Date:
Weeks 19 & 20 - ATP Masters 1000 - Internazionali BNL d'Italia Open - Rome, Italy (clay) - SINGLES ONLY


L32:  (13) Cameron Norrie WR 13 defeated Marton Fucsovics (HUN) WR 92 by 6-2 7-6(4)

Cam was broken serving for the match at 5-1 & 5-3.  Finally converted his seventh match point in the tie-break!

*****

L16:  (1) Novak Djokovic (SRB) WR 1 vs (13) Cameron Norrie WR 13  furious



__________________


Lower Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 144
Date:
Weeks 19 & 20 - ATP Masters 1000 - Internazionali BNL d'Italia Open - Rome, Italy (clay)


Yikes Glasspool Heliovaara squandering a big lead in the CTB to go out to Tiafoe and McDonald.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58090
Date:

Toby wrote:

Yikes Glasspool Heliovaara squandering a big lead in the CTB to go out to Tiafoe and McDonald.


 rolleyes.gif



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 42337
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:
Toby wrote:

Yikes Glasspool Heliovaara squandering a big lead in the CTB to go out to Tiafoe and McDonald.


 rolleyes.gif


 I think if this thread had singles in the title it would easier to spot that it isnt for doubles. It is easy to get it confused, I would suggest, SC. 

being honest, Im still it convinced why we have separate threads for singles and doubles at some events, I know the arguments but am still a long way from being convinced we need it - no one is that sensitive that we cant just have one thread for a given event!? But weve been over it before so we are where we are !



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 41010
Date:

That sounds like a good idea, Jon, to say put 'singles only' in threads for tournaments where there is also a doubles thread.

Personally otherwise I probably prefer separate doubles threads for Masters tournaments with the significant number of GB entries we have. And indeed I definitely think it's best for Slams to have separate doubles threads.

Let's help people rather than unnecessarily call out folk who post info but 'dare' to post in the 'wrong' thread.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 42337
Date:

indiana wrote:

That sounds like a good idea, Jon, to say put 'singles only' in threads for tournaments where there is also a doubles thread.

Personally otherwise I probably prefer separate doubles threads for Masters tournaments with the significant number of GB entries we have. And indeed I definitely think it's best for Slams to have separate doubles threads.

Let's help people rather than unnecessarily call out folk who post info but 'dare' to post in the 'wrong' thread.


 Agreed! 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55557
Date:

indiana wrote:

That sounds like a good idea, Jon, to say put 'singles only' in threads for tournaments where there is also a doubles thread.

Personally otherwise I probably prefer separate doubles threads for Masters tournaments with the significant number of GB entries we have. And indeed I definitely think it's best for Slams to have separate doubles threads.

Let's help people rather than unnecessarily call out folk who post info but 'dare' to post in the 'wrong' thread.


 Yes, I'd agree

My 2.5p worth:

(a) I like doubles only threads where there's lots of entrants

(b) the singles thread should have 'SINGLES ONLY' on it (to be helpful) 

(c) the doubles thread should have DOUBLES, maybe in bold - i.e. something to make it stand out a bit more, it gets lost

 



__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4 5 6  >  Last»  | Page of 6  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard