Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Weeks 27 & 28 - The Championships, Wimbledon (grass) - DOUBLES


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58090
Date:
RE: Weeks 27 & 28 - The Championships, Wimbledon (grass) - DOUBLES


Jajon wrote:

Do the blokes play best of 3 sets in doubles now at wimby?


Yes - see here.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58090
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:
Stircrazy wrote:
L64:  (3) Rajeev Ram (USA) & Joe Salisbury CR 11 (5+6) vs (ALT) Tallon Griekspoor & Bart Stevens (NED/NED) CR 292 (176+116)

Lestienne/Moutet & Barrère/Halys are now in as alternates replacing Ramos/Zapata & Cornea/Lajovic repectively...


Now the Indians, Bhambri & Myneni, have replaced Wu & Zhang. 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58090
Date:

Jamie's Wimbledon column for the Beeb.  Since it consists of his thoughts as expressed to Jonathan Jurejko, I blame whoever transcribed his words for "were a good team" towards the end... 



__________________


County player

Status: Offline
Posts: 814
Date:

How are Stefanos and his brother in the MD? Their combined ranking is something like 278, did they get a wildcard?

__________________
Come on brits :D


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58090
Date:

wales1994 wrote:

How are Stefanos and his brother in the MD? Their combined ranking is something like 278, did they get a wildcard?


No, no wild card.  I  presume they got in by virtue of Stefanos' singles ranking.



__________________


Masters Series Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 3819
Date:

wales1994 wrote:

How are Stefanos and his brother in the MD? Their combined ranking is something like 278, did they get a wildcard?


 111 for entry ranking based on current rankings. Petros doubles 108 and Stefanos singles 5. You can use either singles or doubles ranking to enter doubles.



__________________


County player

Status: Offline
Posts: 814
Date:

Madadman wrote:
wales1994 wrote:

How are Stefanos and his brother in the MD? Their combined ranking is something like 278, did they get a wildcard?


 111 for entry ranking based on current rankings. Petros doubles 108 and Stefanos singles 5. You can use either singles or doubles ranking to enter doubles.


 That's so annoying to me! Very nepotistic. I get that 108 is a decent ranking by his own merit, but he's now gotten into multiple masters and slams based purely on his brother saying 'ok, I'll do it for you'. 



__________________
Come on brits :D


County player

Status: Offline
Posts: 821
Date:

That is so unfair on doubles players who may just miss out on entry because you can use your singles ranking. That should be changed. I'd be preety annoyed if I were a doubles only player ranked near the top 50 for my hard work but then missed out on bigger opportunities because somebody can pull rank with their singles ranking. How the hell is that justified.

__________________

Rich2310



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55555
Date:

Because top singles players are generally better at doubles even if they don't have a high doubles ranking

__________________


County player

Status: Offline
Posts: 821
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:

Because top singles players are generally better at doubles even if they don't have a high doubles ranking


 I can appreciate that but it still doesn't really seem fair on those who are only doubles players. The top singles players don't need the money whereas in doubles the prize money is only a fraction of singles. It just feels like doubles players get a rough deal all because they don't play solo.



__________________

Rich2310



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55555
Date:

Well, it would be unfair if they changed the rules mid-way

But the doubles players know the rules; you could say 'if they want the higher money, they should concentrate on singles'

After all, I'm sure badminton players would say it's unfair how much doubles tennis players get compared with badminton players

Not trying to be difficult but the doubles players aren't 'entitled' to anything - frankly, I think they're extremely lucky - it's never on TV - it's not in the press - doubles is basically subsidised completely by the singles players

But I guess we've been here before



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55555
Date:

Toby & Conor were broken, but broke back and then broke again

7-5 to our college lads

Allez, boys !

__________________


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1261
Date:

Rich2310 wrote:
Coup Droit wrote:

Because top singles players are generally better at doubles even if they don't have a high doubles ranking


 I can appreciate that but it still doesn't really seem fair on those who are only doubles players. The top singles players don't need the money whereas in doubles the prize money is only a fraction of singles. It just feels like doubles players get a rough deal all because they don't play solo.

Every event is the same: players can use their singles or doubles ranking to enter doubles. Tournaments want top players to play doubles if they can. Any player choosing to focus on doubles will know the deal at the start - yes it is tough, but ultimately a case of market forces. And yes, a lot of the top singles players can play good doubles.



-- Edited by 9vicman on Thursday 6th of July 2023 05:00:37 PM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55555
Date:

Brilliant !!!

7-5 6-3

Just super result - enjoyed that

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 42330
Date:

Oh well done, thats good!

__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4 510  >  Last»  | Page of 10  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard