Of course, one could say how disappointing for Charlie and Harry
But I like the depth of players - the bigger that pool, the more chance you have of some breaking out
George Loffhagen has basically been 'cheated' out of his second set when Tarvet's smash on MP that seemed well long was called in. Loffers is always ultra chilled about all that dort of thing but even he got a little narked
Of course, he was 5-1 and 6-4 up in the TB, and then managed to lose it, which is no one's fault but his own....
Of course, one could say how disappointing for Charlie and Harry
But I like the depth of players - the bigger that pool, the more chance you have of some breaking out
George Loffhagen has basically been 'cheated' out of his second set when Tarvet's smash on MP that seemed well long was called in. Loffers is always ultra chilled about all that dort of thing but even he got a little narked
Of course, he was 5-1 and 6-4 up in the TB, and then managed to lose it, which is no one's fault but his own....
So into a third...
I have to say CD there were some idiosyncratic, to say the least, decisions by the umpires in the games I saw the other day. At one point the umpire overruled the linesman on the far side line that looked clearly in.
Bit disappointed that Henry didn't get through as I enjoyed watching his match but I'm imagining Jack is underrated anyway and probably would have been in the 300s at least by now if he was regularly on the tour.
Not a good day for the prospective top 500 or 250 club. Does create a bigger pool going forward. Would seem we might end up with a near record amount in the top 800-1000 soon.