I think it's quite some collective feat for twice our whole range of predictions to miss the final total of wins.
And hey, we can't be accused of being perennially too optimistic or too pessimistic, having gone hugely under for the French Open and gone over for the US Open.
Though to be fair the GB players must take the real credit / blame just because those have been such unpredictable ( as we have literally proved ) and just darn strange totals.
Anyway, the trend for now re GB performances goes: French Open - brilliant, Wimbledon - meh, US Open - awful, Australian Open? - new year, new trend let's hope.
I think it's quite some collective feat for twice our whole range of predictions to miss the final total of wins.
And hey, we can't be accused of being perennially too optimistic or too pessimistic, having gone hugely under for the French Open and gone over for the US Open.
Though to be fair the GB players must take the real credit / blame just because those have been such unpredictable ( as we have literally proved ) and just darn strange totals.
Anyway, the trend for now re GB performances goes: French Open - brilliant, Wimbledon - meh, US Open - awful, Australian Open? - new year, new trend let's hope.
I know, bizarre? Who'd have thought we would be a clay court nation in 2025?!
There does seem to be a collective performance here - I know some argue it isnt at all like that, just take care of your own results etc. But surely a collective great result like the FO must, in some part, come from inspiration from those around you and the collective USO poor display, some malaise or tiredness in the ranks? At least in small part
I am sure I will be told that is rubbish but outside that, it is very hard to explain
Here is our updated roll of honour, to include Telstar. I will update the total once British interest is over and, in this tally, WILL also include the 2 mixed doubles winners as it is a better comparator when we look back on how many wins Brits achieved - better to have the two wins than not, right now!!
Wins
Titles
2019
Best predictor
13
AO
Wolf, Miriamabc
11
FO
No winner named
25
W
Wolf (2)
24
USO
Miriamabc (2), MichaelD, Indiana
2020
21
AO
Blue Belle
9
FO
SuperT
W
no competition
11
USO
SuperT (2)
2021
23
AO
Indiana (2)
9
FO
Brendan F
40
W
foobarbaz
32
USO
Miriamabc (3)
2022
17
AO
brittak
16
FO
no competition
43
W
Miramabc (4)
26
USO
JonH
2023
20
AO
Coup Droit, Indiana (3)
15
FO
Miriamabc (5), JonH (2)
30
W
Miriamabc (6)
26
USO
Elegant Point
2024
21
AO
Elegant Point (2), goldfish
13
FO
mdewey
40
W
Indiana (4)
27
USO
Indiana (5), FlipFlops
2025
28
AO
goldfish (2)
36
FO
Indiana (6)
39
W
DF, Danten
USO
Telstar
-- Edited by JonH comes home on Sunday 31st of August 2025 10:30:05 PM
If we include the mixed - and for comparison purposes we should- the USO will end up with 17 or 18 British wins. Which will take the year as a whole to close to 120 wins. The previous best was 102, so close to a 20 percent increase this year on any past year since we started this.
the USO may have been a washout, but the FO and AO were great fortnights that shouldnt be forgotten.
Here is our updated roll of honour, to include Telstar. I will update the total once British interest is over and, in this tally, WILL also include the 2 mixed doubles winners as it is a better comparator when we look back on how many wins Brits achieved - better to have the two wins than not, right now!!
Wins
Titles
2019
Best predictor
13
AO
Wolf, Miriamabc
11
FO
No winner named
25
W
Wolf (2)
24
USO
Miriamabc (2), MichaelD, Indiana
2020
21
AO
Blue Belle
9
FO
SuperT
W
no competition
11
USO
SuperT (2)
2021
23
AO
Indiana (2)
9
FO
Brendan F
40
W
foobarbaz
32
USO
Miriamabc (3)
2022
17
AO
brittak
16
FO
no competition
43
W
Miramabc (4)
26
USO
JonH
2023
20
AO
Coup Droit, Indiana (3)
15
FO
Miriamabc (5), JonH (2)
30
W
Miriamabc (6)
26
USO
Elegant Point
2024
21
AO
Elegant Point (2), goldfish
13
FO
mdewey
40
W
Indiana (4)
27
USO
Indiana (5), FlipFlops
2025
28
AO
goldfish (2)
36
FO
Indiana (6)
39
W
DF, Danten
17 - including mixed
USO
Telstar
And so the season is over for this - 5 different people won a slam or part of one; DF topped the year long rankings.
For those who took part in all or most of these, thank you. I hope you enjoyed it. For those who didnt, why not give it a go next year, starting in January for the Aussie Open!
Now, we didn't include the US Open Mixed Doubles in our predictions contest this year...but what about the Australian Open and the Million Dollar One Point Slam - SC posted elsewhere about it, I cant find her post - but in essence, there are 32 players (22 pros and 10 amateurs) and they play 5 rounds (31 "matches") of one point tennis to crown a winner of $1m. The players apparently play "rock, paper, scissors" to determine who serves. Pros get one serve only, amateurs will have two serves. Not sure how the draw works and who is playing, Alcaraz apparently is.
For 2026, Ive chosen to change the points system for the in year overall rankings from this - it goes a little deeper (top 12 as opposed to top 10) and spreads the points a little more, with the bonus for being spot on being relatively less than last year, so that the bonus doesnt out reward someone already well rewarded for winning.
1st 50
2nd 40
3rd 30
4th 25
5th 20
6th 15
7th 10
8th 7
9th 5
10th 3
11th 2
12th 1
And then the bonus of 5 points for being spot on with the prediction.
For 2026, Ive chosen to change the points system for the in year overall rankings from this - it goes a little deeper (top 12 as opposed to top 10) and spreads the points a little more, with the bonus for being spot on being relatively less than last year, so that the bonus doesnt out reward someone already well rewarded for winning.
1st 50 2nd 40 3rd 30 4th 25 5th 20 6th 15 7th 10 8th 7 9th 5 10th 3 11th 2 12th 1 And then the bonus of 5 points for being spot on with the prediction.
I will start a new thread for this in January
We may end up with 5 predictors landing on equal 1st and 55 points from the AO, and then a big gap to 6th place. Probably means the points system is not perfect, but it is what I decided to go with and cant change now. Will obviously look quite different as a table if Neal wins the mens doubles and we have just one winner and a large number of players then landing on what will be equal second.
I am over the moon to be in with a shout among the 5. The only time when I have been placed before, in ANY of the prediction competitions, is when I haven't entered LoL!
I will be just as delighted if Elegant Point gets it spot on.
Thanks for running the competition Jon.
For 2026, Ive chosen to change the points system for the in year overall rankings from this - it goes a little deeper (top 12 as opposed to top 10) and spreads the points a little more, with the bonus for being spot on being relatively less than last year, so that the bonus doesnt out reward someone already well rewarded for winning.
1st 50 2nd 40 3rd 30 4th 25 5th 20 6th 15 7th 10 8th 7 9th 5 10th 3 11th 2 12th 1 And then the bonus of 5 points for being spot on with the prediction.
I will start a new thread for this in January
We may end up with 5 predictors landing on equal 1st and 55 points from the AO, and then a big gap to 6th place. Probably means the points system is not perfect, but it is what I decided to go with and cant change now. Will obviously look quite different as a table if Neal wins the mens doubles and we have just one winner and a large number of players then landing on what will be equal second.
Ill post the standings later, following the AO. Suffice to say, we had a winner spot on so they get 55 points. We had 9 runners up who all get equal second and 40 points. And then a good number equal 11th and they get 2 points for that. we dont usually get such bunching around the winner so the drop through being one win out is quite dramatic between those in second and those just behind on what turns out to be 11th place.
Those in equal positions, eg equal second, all get second place points. Similarly equal 11th all get 11th placed points. Those in second are on 20 or 22 wins predicted. Those in 11th are on 19 or 23 wins predicted.
I think it's quite some collective feat for twice our whole range of predictions to miss the final total of wins.
And hey, we can't be accused of being perennially too optimistic or too pessimistic, having gone hugely under for the French Open and gone over for the US Open.
Though to be fair the GB players must take the real credit / blame just because those have been such unpredictable ( as we have literally proved ) and just darn strange totals.
Anyway, the trend for now re GB performances goes: French Open - brilliant, Wimbledon - meh, US Open - awful, Australian Open? - new year, new trend let's hope.
Australian Open verdict? - meh singles; doubles ok?