L16:- Holly Hutchinson (GBR) / Amelia Rajecki (GBR) CR569 (290+279) [3] def Iva Primorac (CRO) / Federica Urgesi (ITA) CR940 (573+367) 2-6 6-4 10-5 Took a little while to settle in only their second tournament together
L16:- Holly Hutchinson (GBR) / Amelia Rajecki (GBR) CR569 (290+279) [3] def Iva Primorac (CRO) / Federica Urgesi (ITA) CR940 (573+367) 2-6 6-4 10-5 Took a little while to settle in only their second tournament together
L32:- Katherine Barnes (GBR) WR806 [LL] v Clara Vlasselaer (BEL) WR416
How did she get a LL spot when 4 seeded players lost in the 2nd round of qualis?
In ITFs it's a random draw of all FQR losers with a WTA ranking. It would be helpful and aid transparency if more organisers publish the LL draw like the USTA do.
QF:- Sohyun Park (KOR) / Hong Yi Cody Wong (HKG) CR522 (242+280) [1] OR Lucy Furness (FRA) / Halle Pringle (GBR) UNR (UNR+UNR) v Esther Adeshina (GBR) / Victoria Allen (GBR) CR2224 (1027+1197)
I wonder when the ITf are going to fix they utterly bonkers website. If you click the Live Scores button it sometimes gives you the names of the two players and the time the match took but omits the scores. In other cases it is even crazier, they give you the time the match took and the scores but fails to tell you who the two players were.
Why do sites switch to new versions of the software before the new version is working? Any software engineer will tell you to run the old and new versions in parallel before abandoning the old (working!) system.
I wonder when the ITf are going to fix they utterly bonkers website. If you click the Live Scores button it sometimes gives you the names of the two players and the time the match took but omits the scores. In other cases it is even crazier, they give you the time the match took and the scores but fails to tell you who the two players were.
Why do sites switch to new versions of the software before the new version is working? Any software engineer will tell you to run the old and new versions in parallel before abandoning the old (working!) system.
I doubt any software engineers were involved in the decision. If they'd kept the old system a bit longer they'd probably have to renew their support contract an dexplain why the new system wasn't ready. Loss of face and an extra cost might affect their bonuses.