Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 7 - ITF M25 - Roehampton, Great Britain (indoor hard)


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 43244
Date:
RE: Week 7 - ITF M25 - Roehampton, Great Britain (indoor hard)


Coup Droit wrote:
paulisi wrote:
Coup Droit wrote:
paulisi wrote:

Hearing good things about Patrick Brady, so expecting a few decent results this week.


About a year ago, Jaggy and I had an ongoing converstaion about Patrick

Jaggy argued - justifiably - that his game is more than the sum of its parts

I've watched him (Patrick, not Jaggy ) be very agile, a good engine, a decent game that could easily get up towards the 500 mark

But I'm still not convinced

(By neither him nor his brother, tbh, though it's sweet to see them both playing here together) 


 It's his serve that still needs work, the rest of his game is very good.


 Sorry, paulis, but having watched a fair bit of Patrick's match today, the rest of his game is still not 'very' good - it's reasonable, it's agile, it's well-rounded, but it's nothing worthy of getting excited about

Very much as it used to be, tbh, just a touch better as he's got a little taller and stronger 

He lost today to Ben Jones, and deservedly so - it was a close match but Ben (who isn't a great hope for GB tennis either) had the more fire in his game

Patrick's grandstanding and dying duck act - and refusing to shake the umpire's hand - is hardly endearing either 

That said, Greg R shouting loudly from the stands at every point is hardly helpful - I've said before that I dislike it, and I realise it's each to their own, but shouting 'that's the way, there you go' when Patrick has made a UE, at a tense point at the backend of the match, and when Patrick is down the end where Greg is shouting from, is hardly 'fairplay' 


As an aside, Conor Brady is a board member and often visits although doesnt post.  



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 55935
Date:

JonH comes home wrote:
Coup Droit wrote:
paulisi wrote:
Coup Droit wrote:
paulisi wrote:

Hearing good things about Patrick Brady, so expecting a few decent results this week.


About a year ago, Jaggy and I had an ongoing converstaion about Patrick

Jaggy argued - justifiably - that his game is more than the sum of its parts

I've watched him (Patrick, not Jaggy ) be very agile, a good engine, a decent game that could easily get up towards the 500 mark

But I'm still not convinced

(By neither him nor his brother, tbh, though it's sweet to see them both playing here together) 


 It's his serve that still needs work, the rest of his game is very good.


 Sorry, paulis, but having watched a fair bit of Patrick's match today, the rest of his game is still not 'very' good - it's reasonable, it's agile, it's well-rounded, but it's nothing worthy of getting excited about

Very much as it used to be, tbh, just a touch better as he's got a little taller and stronger 

He lost today to Ben Jones, and deservedly so - it was a close match but Ben (who isn't a great hope for GB tennis either) had the more fire in his game

Patrick's grandstanding and dying duck act - and refusing to shake the umpire's hand - is hardly endearing either 

That said, Greg R shouting loudly from the stands at every point is hardly helpful - I've said before that I dislike it, and I realise it's each to their own, but shouting 'that's the way, there you go' when Patrick has made a UE, at a tense point at the backend of the match, and when Patrick is down the end where Greg is shouting from, is hardly 'fairplay' 


As an aside, Conor Brady is a board member and often visits although doesnt post.  


 And so ?  



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58727
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:

          L32:  (5) Henry Searle WR 389 defeated (Q) Tom Hands WR 1391 by 3 & 4

          *****

          L16:  (1) Rudolf Molleker (GER) WR 282 vs Arthur Féry WR 580

          L16:  (8) Daniil Glinka (EST) WR 451 (CH = 390 last September) vs (WC) Liam Broady WR 770
          _________________________________________________________________________________________________

L32:  Ben Jones WR 679 defeated (Q) Patrick Brady WR 862 by 7-6(5) 4-6 6-3

*****

L16:  Ben Jones WR 679 vs Elmar Ejupovic (GER) WR 561 (CH = 273 in April 2023)



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58727
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:

L32:  Keegan Smith (USA) WR 554 defeated (WC) James Story WR 739 by 3 & 4


L32:  (7) Raul Brancaccio (ITA) WR 432 defeated (Q) Alexis Canter WR 1438 by 4 & 3



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17570
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:
JonH comes home wrote:
Coup Droit wrote:
paulisi wrote:
Coup Droit wrote:
paulisi wrote:

Hearing good things about Patrick Brady, so expecting a few decent results this week.


About a year ago, Jaggy and I had an ongoing converstaion about Patrick

Jaggy argued - justifiably - that his game is more than the sum of its parts

I've watched him (Patrick, not Jaggy ) be very agile, a good engine, a decent game that could easily get up towards the 500 mark

But I'm still not convinced

(By neither him nor his brother, tbh, though it's sweet to see them both playing here together) 


 It's his serve that still needs work, the rest of his game is very good.


 Sorry, paulis, but having watched a fair bit of Patrick's match today, the rest of his game is still not 'very' good - it's reasonable, it's agile, it's well-rounded, but it's nothing worthy of getting excited about

Very much as it used to be, tbh, just a touch better as he's got a little taller and stronger 

He lost today to Ben Jones, and deservedly so - it was a close match but Ben (who isn't a great hope for GB tennis either) had the more fire in his game

Patrick's grandstanding and dying duck act - and refusing to shake the umpire's hand - is hardly endearing either 

That said, Greg R shouting loudly from the stands at every point is hardly helpful - I've said before that I dislike it, and I realise it's each to their own, but shouting 'that's the way, there you go' when Patrick has made a UE, at a tense point at the backend of the match, and when Patrick is down the end where Greg is shouting from, is hardly 'fairplay' 


As an aside, Conor Brady is a board member and often visits although doesnt post.  


 And so ?  


 A large number of the pro players and juniors or parents read the board. Some even post.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 55935
Date:

paulisi wrote:
Coup Droit wrote:
JonH comes home wrote:
Coup Droit wrote:
paulisi wrote:
Coup Droit wrote:
paulisi wrote:

Hearing good things about Patrick Brady, so expecting a few decent results this week.


About a year ago, Jaggy and I had an ongoing converstaion about Patrick

Jaggy argued - justifiably - that his game is more than the sum of its parts

I've watched him (Patrick, not Jaggy ) be very agile, a good engine, a decent game that could easily get up towards the 500 mark

But I'm still not convinced

(By neither him nor his brother, tbh, though it's sweet to see them both playing here together) 


 It's his serve that still needs work, the rest of his game is very good.


 Sorry, paulis, but having watched a fair bit of Patrick's match today, the rest of his game is still not 'very' good - it's reasonable, it's agile, it's well-rounded, but it's nothing worthy of getting excited about

Very much as it used to be, tbh, just a touch better as he's got a little taller and stronger 

He lost today to Ben Jones, and deservedly so - it was a close match but Ben (who isn't a great hope for GB tennis either) had the more fire in his game

Patrick's grandstanding and dying duck act - and refusing to shake the umpire's hand - is hardly endearing either 

That said, Greg R shouting loudly from the stands at every point is hardly helpful - I've said before that I dislike it, and I realise it's each to their own, but shouting 'that's the way, there you go' when Patrick has made a UE, at a tense point at the backend of the match, and when Patrick is down the end where Greg is shouting from, is hardly 'fairplay' 


As an aside, Conor Brady is a board member and often visits although doesnt post.  


 And so ?  


 A large number of the pro players and juniors or parents read the board. Some even post.


Yes, of course, I know that - I talk to quite a few of them in private posts

But I don't see what difference it makes

If you say that someone has a reasonable, agile game that could see them in the top-500 but you don't see them in the top-250, say, and they really should behave a little better (both Patrick and, separately, Greg), then good, if they read it - especially the second bit 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 43244
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:
paulisi wrote:
Coup Droit wrote:
JonH comes home wrote:
Coup Droit wrote:
paulisi wrote:
Coup Droit wrote:
paulisi wrote:

Hearing good things about Patrick Brady, so expecting a few decent results this week.


About a year ago, Jaggy and I had an ongoing converstaion about Patrick

Jaggy argued - justifiably - that his game is more than the sum of its parts

I've watched him (Patrick, not Jaggy ) be very agile, a good engine, a decent game that could easily get up towards the 500 mark

But I'm still not convinced

(By neither him nor his brother, tbh, though it's sweet to see them both playing here together) 


 It's his serve that still needs work, the rest of his game is very good.


 Sorry, paulis, but having watched a fair bit of Patrick's match today, the rest of his game is still not 'very' good - it's reasonable, it's agile, it's well-rounded, but it's nothing worthy of getting excited about

Very much as it used to be, tbh, just a touch better as he's got a little taller and stronger 

He lost today to Ben Jones, and deservedly so - it was a close match but Ben (who isn't a great hope for GB tennis either) had the more fire in his game

Patrick's grandstanding and dying duck act - and refusing to shake the umpire's hand - is hardly endearing either 

That said, Greg R shouting loudly from the stands at every point is hardly helpful - I've said before that I dislike it, and I realise it's each to their own, but shouting 'that's the way, there you go' when Patrick has made a UE, at a tense point at the backend of the match, and when Patrick is down the end where Greg is shouting from, is hardly 'fairplay' 


As an aside, Conor Brady is a board member and often visits although doesnt post.  


 And so ?  


 A large number of the pro players and juniors or parents read the board. Some even post.


Yes, of course, I know that - I talk to quite a few of them in private posts

But I don't see what difference it makes

If you say that someone has a reasonable, agile game that could see them in the top-500 but you don't see them in the top-250, say, and they really should behave a little better (both Patrick and, separately, Greg), then good, if they read it - especially the second bit 


 It was just an observation - nothing really intended other than to say what I said and to use as you wish!



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 55935
Date:

Quite understand, Jon



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58727
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:

L16:  (1) Rudolf Molleker (GER) WR 282 vs Arthur Féry WR 580

L16:  (8) Daniil Glinka (EST) WR 451 (CH = 390 last September) vs (WC) Liam Broady WR 770

L16:  Ben Jones WR 679 vs Elmar Ejupovic (GER) WR 561 (CH = 273 in April 2023)


L32:  Max Wiskandt (GER) WR 492 defeated (Q) Marcus Walters WR 1295 by 7-5 4-6 6-4  hmm

L32:  George Loffhagen WR 530 defeated (WC) Harry Wendelken WR 642 by 6-4 4-6 6-2

*****

L16:  Max Wiskandt (GER) WR 492 vs (5) Henry Searle WR 389

L16:  (7) Raul Brancaccio (ITA) WR 432 vs George Loffhagen WR 530



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58727
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:
L16:  (1) Rudolf Molleker (GER) WR 282 vs Arthur Féry WR 580

         L16:  (8) Daniil Glinka (EST) WR 451 (CH = 390 last September) vs (WC) Liam Broady WR 770

         L16:  Ben Jones WR 679 vs Elmar Ejupovic (GER) WR 561 (CH = 273 in April 2023)

L16:  Max Wiskandt (GER) WR 492 vs (5) Henry Searle WR 389

L16:  (7) Raul Brancaccio (ITA) WR 432 vs George Loffhagen WR 530


L32:  (6) Anton Matusevich WR 421 defeated (WC) Toby Samuel WR 1612 by 6-1 3-6 6-4



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58727
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:
Stircrazy wrote:
L16:  (1) Rudolf Molleker (GER) WR 282 vs Arthur Féry WR 580

         L16:  (8) Daniil Glinka (EST) WR 451 (CH = 390 last September) vs (WC) Liam Broady WR 770

         L16:  Ben Jones WR 679 vs Elmar Ejupovic (GER) WR 561 (CH = 273 in April 2023)

L16:  Max Wiskandt (GER) WR 492 vs (5) Henry Searle WR 389

L16:  (7) Raul Brancaccio (ITA) WR 432 vs George Loffhagen WR 530


L32:  (6) Anton Matusevich WR 421 defeated (WC) Toby Samuel WR 1612 by 6-1 3-6 6-4


L32:  Stuart Parker WR 527 defeated (Q) Cyril Vandermeersch (FRA) WR 837 by 7-6(5) 4-6 6-3

*****

L16:  Stuart Parker WR 527 vs (6) Anton Matusevich WR 421



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58727
Date:

L16:  Arthur Féry WR 580 defeated (1) Rudolf Molleker (GER) WR 282 by 4 & 4  biggrin 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 43244
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:

L16:  Arthur Féry WR 580 defeated (1) Rudolf Molleker (GER) WR 282 by 4 & 4  biggrin 


 Excellent, well done Arthur!



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58727
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:

L16:  Arthur Féry WR 580 defeated (1) Rudolf Molleker (GER) WR 282 by 4 & 4  biggrin 


L16:  (WC) Liam Broady WR 770 defeated (8) Daniil Glinka (EST) WR 451 by 2-6 6-1 6-4  biggrin

I thought he'd blown it after that first set!



__________________


Hall of fame

Status: Online
Posts: 9462
Date:

Searle broken at 5-5 in the third set. But has just broken back so its a final set tiebreak

__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4 5 68  >  Last»  | Page of 8  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard