British Tennis Forum - Celebrating 20 Years!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Weeks 31 & 32 - ATP Masters 1000 (National Bank Open) - Toronto, Canada (hard)


Lower Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 121
Date:
Weeks 31 & 32 - ATP Masters 1000 (National Bank Open) - Toronto, Canada (hard)


Norrie levels with a dominant second set tie-break.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 62605
Date:

L64:  Aleksandar Vukic (AUS) WR 99 defeated (31) Cameron Norrie WR 39 by 6-3 6-7(2) 6-3  bleh



__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2628
Date:

Hmmm

__________________

GO TEAM GBR IN 2025!



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10011
Date:

Norrie looked to be struggling with something and Vukic was serving bombs

__________________


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2018
Date:

The commentary team noted (frequently and often) that Mr Norrie was suffering some sort of illness.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 62605
Date:

L32:  (2) Julian Cash & Lloyd Glasspool CR 7 (4+3) defeated Flavio Cobolli & Alejandro Davidovich (ITA/ESP) CR 607 (185+422) by 6-4 4-6 [15-13]

The specialist singles players probably thought they had a point to prove to the Wimbledon champions...  



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 62605
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:

L32:  (2) Julian Cash & Lloyd Glasspool CR 7 (4+3) defeated Flavio Cobolli & Alejandro Davidovich (ITA/ESP) CR 607 (185+422) by 6-4 4-6 [15-13]

The specialist singles players probably thought they had a point to prove to the Wimbledon champions...  


L16:  John Peers & Jan Zielinski (AUS/POL) CR 57 (25+32) vs (2) Julian Cash & Lloyd Glasspool CR 7 (4+3)



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 62605
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:

L16:  John Peers & Jan Zielinski (AUS/POL) CR 57 (25+32) vs (2) Julian Cash & Lloyd Glasspool CR 7 (4+3)


L32:  (6) Joe Salisbury & Neal Skupski CR 30 (16+14) defeated Marcelo Melo & Alexander Zverev (BRA/GER) CR 395 (53+342) by 3 & 4

*****

L16:  Austin Krajicek & Horacio Zeballos (USA/ARG) CR 67 (59+8) vs (6) Joe Salisbury & Neal Skupski CR 30 (16+14)



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 62605
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:
L16:  John Peers & Jan Zielinski (AUS/POL) CR 57 (25+32) vs (2) Julian Cash & Lloyd Glasspool CR 7 (4+3)

L16:  Austin Krajicek & Horacio Zeballos (USA/ARG) CR 67 (59+8) vs (6) Joe Salisbury & Neal Skupski CR 30 (16+14)


L32:  (3) Harri Heliövaara (FIN) & Henry Patten CR 10 (5+5) defeated Lorenzo Musetti & Lorenzo Sonego (ITA/ITA) CR 487 (253+234) by 7-6(3) 6-7(5) [10-3]

*****

L16:  (3) Harri Heliövaara (FIN) & Henry Patten CR 10 (5+5) vs (ALT) Fernando Romboli & John-Patrick Smith (BRA/AUS) CR 109 (51+58)



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 47394
Date:

Good to see all 3 pairs get through, werent easy opening matches for any of them

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 42768
Date:

JonH comes home wrote:

Good to see all 3 pairs get through, werent easy opening matches for any of them


 They were interesting matches with the singles players. I'm not sure how easy / difficult that made them comparative to other draws.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 47394
Date:

Fair point Indy. Talking of interesting, anyone else struggling to find this event interesting? I dont know if it is lack of the Brits doing well, or lack of some of the big names, but both mens and womens are struggling to capture my interest.

Im thinking its more that the 1000 concept is actually diminished by over supply and by the 10 day format. Scarcity is better, sometimes.

Im good with the Miami and IW events, would prefer them as one week though for each, but the gap for two big events fits well.

The 3 clay court Masters events is too many, on the mens side - I cant recall what women have, is it Dubai? But the three mens events has always felt too many for me. Personally, Ive never liked Madrid, Id get rid of that one and stick with MC and Rome as two one week events.

Canada and Cinci is too much in this slot, Ive always felt one should go - dont care at all for Cinci so Id stick with Canada and hope that if it was the only one, it would be more exciting too follow.

Shanghai and Paris suit me fine. Again, 7 days is all that is needed. Women have Wuhan thrown in there, which feels such an irrelevant event, personally Id can that for an event in Europe, but I guess that wont happen.

I guess what Im saying is 9 is just too many in both sides, Id cull it to 7, can the 10 day events, and mainly in this slot and the clay season, its just too congested and it actually diminishes the product and the value of the win. Snore.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 62605
Date:

L16:  (2) Julian Cash & Lloyd Glasspool CR 7 (4+3) defeated John Peers & Jan Zielinski (AUS/POL) CR 57 (25+32) by 6-2 6-7(3) [10-8]



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 47394
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:

L16:  (2) Julian Cash & Lloyd Glasspool CR 7 (4+3) defeated John Peers & Jan Zielinski (AUS/POL) CR 57 (25+32) by 6-2 6-7(3) [10-8]


 Another tight but decent British win. Harri in his blog commented that the courts are super fast and the ball is flying. He mentioned he was having real trouble controlling his returns and he and Henry were taking to receiving first serve with both at the baseline; I know some pairs do that but Henry and Harri dont. 
The fast courts might favour Julian and Lloyd again this event, but I suspect all three pairs with Brits in will find them more to their liking than some of the other pairs find them. 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 62605
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:

L16:  (2) Julian Cash & Lloyd Glasspool CR 7 (4+3) defeated John Peers & Jan Zielinski (AUS/POL) CR 57 (25+32) by 6-2 6-7(3) [10-8]


QF:  Guido Andreozzi & Sander Arends (ARG/NED) CR 70 (46+24) vs (2) Julian Cash & Lloyd Glasspool CR 7 (4+3)



__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4 57  >  Last»  | Page of 7  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard