Thinking a bit more about this - I'm wondering what people think the reasons are that they didn't at least make 4 of the 16 spots open to entries based on doubles rankings to give it some kind of increased sense of legitimacy - for me that would have really made it much more palatable to call it a Grand Slam then. I would think something like that might have meant less tennis enthusiasts were put off the idea and make it seem more of an attractive event long term. To me it feels like top players might be thinking they'll give it a go this once but probably not in future years (I'm not basing that one owt I've heard just my thinking).
What do others on here feel would have been enough to make it legitimate enough as a transition into a new kind of event that might be taken seriously long term. Also what do you think is motivating the singles players to say yes to it? The prize money is that high really.
They went the player route they did purely for bums on seats/ turning the TV on. Nothing more than that. And hoping the resulting pairs would create a narrative as a result.
$1m - not sure, it isnt massive to some of the players involved, I agree, but perhaps the players saw it as a chance to play and get into the groove on the big arena, sort of a practice with the chance of a bit of dosh and a slam title at the end of it?
I doubt long term legitimacy is at the forefront of the USTA's minds. They've written off the existing mixed doubles format, amd they see it as a focal point for US Open Fan Week. Or as we'll come to know it, Week 1 of a three-week Slam. Don't think there's any going back. We'll maybe Cincinnati will end on a Sunday in future.
Not entirely sure when it is due to hit, but this storm/ exhurricane called Erin seems like it could drop a lot of rain on the east coast later. Not sure if US tennis is going to be hit hard, but feels like we could see some big rain delays?
Do Ashe and Armstrong have roofs on them? Obviously the qualies courts won't?
I doubt long term legitimacy is at the forefront of the USTA's minds. They've written off the existing mixed doubles format, amd they see it as a focal point for US Open Fan Week. Or as we'll come to know it, Week 1 of a three-week Slam. Don't think there's any going back. We'll maybe Cincinnati will end on a Sunday in future.
I doubt long term legitimacy is at the forefront of the USTA's minds. They've written off the existing mixed doubles format, amd they see it as a focal point for US Open Fan Week. Or as we'll come to know it, Week 1 of a three-week Slam. Don't think there's any going back. We'll maybe Cincinnati will end on a Sunday in future.