British Tennis Forum - Celebrating 20 Years!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 46 - ITF W50 Funchal, Madeira, Portugal - Hard


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 43553
Date:
Week 46 - ITF W50 Funchal, Madeira, Portugal - Hard


Fair dos to Nilsson if she is keeping going and not chucking the doubles because of the schedule ( and she's won her second singles match of the day so is into the singles SF ).



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 43553
Date:

indiana wrote:

Fair dos to Nilsson if she is keeping going and not chucking the doubles because of the schedule ( and she's won her second singles match of the day so is into the singles SF ).


 Ah, Nilsson+ have given a walkover. Holly & Eden into the SF.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 43553
Date:

QF:- Holly Hutchinson (GBR) / Ella McDonald (GBR) CR478 (313+165) [1] 'beat' Eva Bennemann (GER) / Lea Nilsson (SWE) UNR (710+UNR/JR26) by a walkover.

******

SF:- Holly Hutchinson (GBR) / Ella McDonald (GBR) CR 478 (313+165) [1] vs Erika Andreeva (***) / Margaux Rouvroy (FRA),CR 1036 (588+448) [4]



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 27851
Date:

SF:- Holly Hutchinson (GBR) / Ella McDonald (GBR) CR478 (313+165) [1] v Erika Andreeva (***) / Margaux Rouvroy (FRA) CR1036 (588+448) [4]

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 27851
Date:

My understanding is that if they lose, having received two walkovers, they will get points from the previous round, i.e. QF or 11 points, not SF points. Doesn't seem right though.

WTA rulebook Section VIII-3-C-ii

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 27851
Date:

They might even get a match tomorrow ....... just received a walkover into the final.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 49539
Date:

the addict wrote:

They might even get a match tomorrow ....... just received a walkover into the final.


 Is that three straight walkovers? Has that happened before ?! 



__________________


Top national player

Status: Online
Posts: 3356
Date:

the addict wrote:

My understanding is that if they lose, having received two walkovers, they will get points from the previous round, i.e. QF or 11 points, not SF points. Doesn't seem right though.

WTA rulebook Section VIII-3-C-ii


Its better than the no points the ITF rulebook says they would get.

1. General
b) A match won by retirement, default or walkover will count as a match won for ranking points and
prize money. Except in the following cases where no ranking points shall be awarded:
i) walkovers in the first round.
ii) where a player or team has not won any matches in the previous round(s).

4. Walkovers
a) If a player or team receives a walkover in the 1st round, or if a player or team receives a walkover
in a subsequent round(s) without having yet played a match, the player or team will not receive
ranking points, but will receive prize money for the round reached.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 49539
Date:

Lambda wrote:
the addict wrote:

My understanding is that if they lose, having received two walkovers, they will get points from the previous round, i.e. QF or 11 points, not SF points. Doesn't seem right though.

WTA rulebook Section VIII-3-C-ii


Its better than the no points the ITF rulebook says they would get.

1. General
b) A match won by retirement, default or walkover will count as a match won for ranking points and
prize money. Except in the following cases where no ranking points shall be awarded:
i) walkovers in the first round.
ii) where a player or team has not won any matches in the previous round(s).

4. Walkovers
a) If a player or team receives a walkover in the 1st round, or if a player or team receives a walkover
in a subsequent round(s) without having yet played a match, the player or team will not receive
ranking points, but will receive prize money for the round reached.


 I support the ITFs approach more than the WTA to be honest. The money should be paid, youve spent time there and should be compensated accordingly. But youve not won a match and whilst unfortunate, you shouldnt get points at the expense of other players in the rankings. The money doesnt hinder anyone else and therefore is fair and reasonable . 

obviously, if they win the final ( even by retirement!) they then should get all the winners points. 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 27851
Date:

Another walkover ...... and so the final has set - between a pair that hasn't had to play and a pair that won their R1 and QF matches.

F:- Holly Hutchinson (GBR) / Ella McDonald (GBR) CR478 (313+165) [1] v Polina Bakhmutkina (BEL) / Mina Hodzic (GER) CR1221 (474+747)

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 27851
Date:

Holly and Ella warming up for their match - in bright sunshine.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 43553
Date:

the addict wrote:

Holly and Ella warming up for their match - in bright sunshine.


 Hopefully they have opponents.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 27851
Date:

indiana wrote:
the addict wrote:

Holly and Ella warming up for their match - in bright sunshine.


 Hopefully they have opponents.


 biggrin

Halfway there - H+E take the first set 6-2



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 27851
Date:

F:- Holly Hutchinson (GBR) / Ella McDonald (GBR) CR478 (313+165) [1] def Polina Bakhmutkina (BEL) / Mina Hodzic (GER) CR1221 (474+747) 6-2 4-6 10-8    

They succesfully defend the title they won last year, although it was a bit of a struggle from *4-2 in the second !


Ella's 13th doubles title (six with Holly) and fifth this year.



__________________
«First  <  1 2 | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard