British Tennis Forum - Celebrating 20 Years!

JonH wrote:

---

Julia Carrot wrote:

---

Coup Droit wrote:

---

Julia Carrot wrote:

---

I voted a couple of days ago, I'm pretty sure I voted for the lowest number - 25 or less i think. Sorry I didn't make a comment at the time.

---

 Huh-huh ? 

---

At the time I felt  somewhat disloyal which is why I hesitated to 'declare' !! 

---

 There are two votes for 25 or less so it makes sense as we only have Spireman declared for that. So Id be happy to accept it, Miriam, if Julia can let us know the exact number she voted for (25 or less doesnt work, we need to get a number!)

 

I know some will be incandescent but we ask anonymous folks to declare at any time and i trust her! 

---

Hi,

Sorry about my   inefficiency.

First I assume I can be sure I actually did vote as I am seeing results, and I believe you need to have voted to view them..... correct?

I am also sure that I voted really low, I think actually the lowest at the time, so perhaps '24' if there is a vote showing for that amount, otherwise 25.  

I quite understand if I am disqualified though for not declaring earlier and then not being 100 percent being sure as to the actual figure.   My mind tells me 24 is the most likely,  and   my memory is always accurate,   except when it isn't ,  which at my age is  quite likely.

Julia Carrot wrote:

---

JonH wrote:

---

Julia Carrot wrote:

---

Coup Droit wrote:

---

Julia Carrot wrote:

---

I voted a couple of days ago, I'm pretty sure I voted for the lowest number - 25 or less i think. Sorry I didn't make a comment at the time.

---

 Huh-huh ? 

---

At the time I felt  somewhat disloyal which is why I hesitated to 'declare' !! 

---

 There are two votes for 25 or less so it makes sense as we only have Spireman declared for that. So Id be happy to accept it, Miriam, if Julia can let us know the exact number she voted for (25 or less doesnt work, we need to get a number!)

 

I know some will be incandescent but we ask anonymous folks to declare at any time and i trust her! 

---

Hi,

 

Sorry about my   inefficiency.

 

First I assume I can be sure I actually did vote as I am seeing results, and I believe you need to have voted to view them..... correct?

 

I am also sure that I voted really low, I think actually the lowest at the time, so perhaps '24' if there is a vote showing for that amount, otherwise 25.  

 

I quite understand if I am disqualified though for not declaring earlier and then not being 100 percent being sure as to the actual figure.   My mind tells me 24 is the most likely,  and   my memory is always accurate,   except when it isn't ,  which at my age is  quite likely.

---

 Lets count it as 24 Julia and youll buy everyone else a drink if you win! 

Yes, we end with 4 R1 singles winners out of 19 starters.

In terms of individual betting favourites, after the withdrawals, we had just 3 ( Arthur, Cam, and Katie B ) plus a joint favourite in Katie S, so kind of 3.5 favourites. So that actually compares OK.

However if you add up all the fractional betting odds, our 'expected' R1 win total was about 7.

Still, a bit of a rescue after Day 1.

I read that 12 of the 32 mixed doubles pairs have British interest.

C'mon, the mixed doublers !

3 wins g'teed for starters, if they can make the starting line, by Brit vs Brit meetings in R1

8 - Henry ( & Harri ) - MD R1

10 scheduled for action tomorrow :

3 MS R2 - Jan, Arthur, and Jake
1 WS R2 - Katie S
6 WD R1 - all bar Freya & Eden