British Tennis Forum - Celebrating 20 Years!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Weeks 26-27 - The Championships, Wimbledon - Doubles - grass


Lower Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 244
Date:
RE: Weeks 26-27 - The Championships, Wimbledon - Doubles - grass


Boulter and Watson into a 3rd set,

They certainly played well while saving  3 match points or it might have been 4.



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 7341
Date:

This is a nerve wracking watch.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 62051
Date:

Ian1314 wrote:

Boulter and Watson into a 3rd set,

They certainly played well while saving  3 match points or it might have been 4.


 Yes - and played pretty badly in conceeding so many MPs (and others) 

Not for the faint-hearted, that's for sure 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 12052
Date:

Yeah it's not vintage.

They've just blown 2-0 40-0* in the third...

__________________


Strong Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 534
Date:

Bad service game from Heather, cracked under pressure with double faults, opponents serving for the match

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 62051
Date:

Katie has a pretty poor understanding of doubles

Together, the two of them really could have / should have won that match

But no

__________________


Strong Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 534
Date:

6 losses out of 6, no way to dress that other than very bad for some good doubles players

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 12052
Date:

2-0 40-0*

3-3 40-15* (two good serves from Piter to be fair)

2 points for 4-4*

Lose 6-3 in the third. Pretty abject quality really. Could have won that handily. Did well on the match points but Piter got very lucky in the final deuce (she's not a very likeable character on court us she!)

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 12052
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:

Katie has a pretty poor understanding of doubles

Together, the two of them really could have / should have won that match

But no


 It was the total lack of communication between them on high calls. Drove me insane. And given they are Olympic quarter finalists we know they can play good doubles together! Their opponents are quite typical of the 50-80 WTA doubles specialist range - really not that great and able to keep a good ranking by winning a handful of matches in big tournaments every year.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 62051
Date:

sammmm wrote:

6 losses out of 6, no way to dress that other than very bad for some good doubles players


 or not so good doubles players 



__________________


Strong Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 534
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:
sammmm wrote:

6 losses out of 6, no way to dress that other than very bad for some good doubles players


 or not so good doubles players 


Evidently I guess so

What happened to Liv and Tereza and Harriet + Maia?



-- Edited by sammmm on Thursday 2nd of July 2026 07:42:08 PM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 31355
Date:

I didn't get to see any of the doubles today as it was very crowded as usual and the matches were on the wrong courts in relation to court 1

I'm not surprised that they all lost, although Liv and Tereza were in a 50-50 match. I also thought Harriet and Maia could have had an upset win.

There are a lot of decent doubles players at the moment trying to break into the top 30 or so.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 31355
Date:

Round up of the sorry story 0-7

R1:- Jodie Burrage (GBR) / Mila Stojsavljevic (GBR) CR 576 (305+271) [WC] lost to Hanyu Guo (CHN) / Kristina Mladenovic (FRA) CR 51 (18+33) [10] 3-6 5-7

R1:- Madeleine Brooks (GBR) / Amelia Rajecki (GBR) CR 253 (114+139) [WC] lost to Laura Siegemund (GER) / Vera Zvonareva (***) CR 41 (19+22) [7] 4-6 2-6

R1:- Harriet Dart (GBR) / Maia Lumsden (GBR) CR 148 ( 86+62 ) [WC] lost to Aldila Sutjiadi (INA) / Janice Tjen (INA) CR 93 ( 49+44 ) 3-6 4-6

R1:- Freya Christie (GBR) / Eden Silva (GBR) CR 302 (145+157) [WC] lost to Kimberly Birrell (AUS) / Talia Gibson (AUS) CR 219 (106+113) (2)6-7 3-6

R1:- Alicia Dudeney (GBR) / Mimi Xu (GBR) CR 462 (208+254) [WC] lost to Su-Wei Hsieh (TPE) / Xinyu Wang (CHN) CR 145 (9+136) 3-6 4-6

R1:- Katie Boulter (GBR) / Heather Watson (GBR) CR 676 (295+381) [WC] lost to Katarzyna Piter (POL) / Anna Siskova (CZE) CR 139 (65+74) 4-6 7-6(10) 3-6

R1:- Tereza Mihalikova (SVK) / Olivia Nicholls (GBR) CR 58 (29+29) [12] lost to Jesika Maleckova (CZE) / Miriam Skoch (CZE) CR 108 (57+51) 2-6 (5)6-7



__________________


Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1541
Date:

At least Heather in the company of Marcus have won their first round mixed doubles match.



__________________
DF


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 13131
Date:

the addict wrote:

Round up of the sorry story 0-6

R1:- Jodie Burrage (GBR) / Mila Stojsavljevic (GBR) CR 576 (305+271) [WC] lost to Hanyu Guo (CHN) / Kristina Mladenovic (FRA) CR 51 (18+33) [10] 3-6 5-7

R1:- Madeleine Brooks (GBR) / Amelia Rajecki (GBR) CR 253 (114+139) [WC] lost to Laura Siegemund (GER) / Vera Zvonareva (***) CR 41 (19+22) [7] 4-6 2-6

R1:- Harriet Dart (GBR) / Maia Lumsden (GBR) CR 148 ( 86+62 ) [WC] lost to Aldila Sutjiadi (INA) / Janice Tjen (INA) CR 93 ( 49+44 ) 3-6 4-6

R1:- Freya Christie (GBR) / Eden Silva (GBR) CR 302 (145+157) [WC] lost to Kimberly Birrell (AUS) / Talia Gibson (AUS) CR 219 (106+113) (2)6-7 3-6

R1:- Alicia Dudeney (GBR) / Mimi Xu (GBR) CR 462 (208+254) [WC] lost to Su-Wei Hsieh (TPE) / Xinyu Wang (CHN) CR 145 (9+136) 3-6 4-6

R1:- Katie Boulter (GBR) / Heather Watson (GBR) CR 676 (295+381) [WC] lost to Katarzyna Piter (POL) / Anna Siskova (CZE) CR 139 (65+74) 4-6 7-6(10) 3-6

R1:- Tereza Mihalikova (SVK) / Olivia Nicholls (GBR) CR 58 (29+29) [12] lost to Jesika Maleckova (CZE) / Miriam Skoch (CZE) CR 108 (57+51) 2-6 (5)6-7


 0-7



__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4  >  Last»  | Page of 4  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard