imoen wrote: I make no attempt to hide the fact. ATP finals (or any televised matches) and F1 Grand Prixs are the ony things that will get me out of bed early!
Is it easier to get you into bed or out?
I'll get me coat.
That depends entirely on the context
__________________
To look at a thing is quite different from seeing a thing and one does not see anything until one sees its beauty
Aucks is the only Brit in the draw and he partners Stephen Huss (ex Wimbledon winner). They face fourth seeds Peya/Phau in the first round.
Have these two played together before? Whilst Huss (and Moodie) won Wimbledon in 2005 they were a bit of a one-tournament wonder team and I don't think he's made too much of an impression since, mainly due to a lack of permanent partner. However he is still a top50 doubles player so can't be too bad!
__________________
To look at a thing is quite different from seeing a thing and one does not see anything until one sees its beauty
What do you know about the other two singles wildcards Arka? Do you follow the Indian tennis much or stick to the Brits?
-- Edited by imoen at 14:29, 2006-12-30
I follow Indian tennis thoroughly till Challenger levels. Not much below that, I guess.
Karan Rastogi's WC is very well deserved. Rastogi is finding things very difficult at senior level, but he was ranked as high as 4 in Juniors!! That shows that he has a lot of potential.
Not in favour of the WC given to Prakash Amritraj. Rohan Bopanna was the first choice, but he is playing in the Hopman Cup. It should have gone to Harsh Mankad, a decent player who can do a lot of damage on fast surfaces.
Another choice was a 16 year old boy called Akash Wagh. He was tried out in ATP Bombay last year and did extremely well to lose only 62 75 to eventual champion Dmitry Tursunov. He actually outaced Tursunov in that match! Wagh looked solid in the second set. No signs of nervousness, which is unusual for a 16 year old. The serve is very good for someone of his age and 5 feet 9 inches of height.
I fully expected a double bagel in that match because even world class Juniors usually lose heavily to top 30 players. Gastao Elias is rated as the best 1990 born player but lost 2 and 1 to the same Tursunov on clay. So maybe there is a lot of talent in Wagh.
I must say that our future in men's tennis looks pretty bleak. The only ones who have a good chance of cracking the top 100 are Rastogi and Akash Wagh. All the others need to improve a lot.
Aucks is scheduled to play second on court tomorow after a 10am start local time. I guess that means he'll start around 6am GMT.(They're 5 1/2 hours ahead)
__________________
To look at a thing is quite different from seeing a thing and one does not see anything until one sees its beauty
James got broken in the 1st game of the 2nd set and eventually lost that 6-4 too.
Jonny's conqueror from yesterday made it two bagels in the row when he took the 1st set against Skoch, but Skock hit back, winning the 2nd set t/b 6-1 then handing out a bagel of his own in the final set - what a turnaround!
__________________
GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!
James hit 4 aces, 2 double faults, served at 58%, won 66% of 1st serve pts and 46% of 2nd serve pts. He saved 6/9 bps.
Berrer hit 5 aces, 2 doubles, served at 70%, won 79% of 1st serve pts and 63% of 2nd serve pts, saved 5/6 bps.
Looks like Aucks didn't serve as well as he did against Goodall and that cost him. He didn't get as many freebies on serve in this one and that was always going to be vital as Berrer is a superb retriever, just gets so many balls back and also has a pretty big serve.
Shame that no British players go through to the main draw. A good run in doubles from Auckland and first round defeats for Nadal and Salva-Vidal can make me feel a bit better though.
Congrats to Rastogi for winning his first senior match.
And it was great to see Salva-Vidal lose. It's a shame that he will take home more than $3500 for losing first round though. What a great way Nadal found to ensure that his childhood buddy can fund a few Futures trips.
Salva-Vidal's game is incredibly like Nadal's on occasions, except that it is highly weakened (obvious... he would be ranked in the top 10 if he was as good as Nadal). But the backhand is incredibly strong and he was hitting a few winners which we are more common in top 50 players.
In case anyone is interested, Salva-Vidal doesn't pull his shorts up during serving like Nadal does. Thank God...